Didn't know this. Interesting...
Yeah I cant stop thinking Rolex is intentionally making their watches easier to replicate.
Didn't know this. Interesting...
Have you seen the 41sub yet?
Do you have some images illustrating the black hole effect so I can pass to the makers?
Yes and they also had a bunch of the gen 116610 as well but they still got it wrong. So I need to tell them how exactly they have to make the crystal like.
And the gen 41sub doesnt have AR on the cylcops anymore.
I was referring to pretty much all rolex crystals in general. as for the 41, i am sure we will be able to see more pics once people start getting their hands on them and posting pictures, for now all you see is dealer photos which do not really show the difference. However, you can show them all this thread: https://forum.replica-watch.info/forum/rolex-tudor-replicas/278783-explanation-of-black-hole-effect
It has a ton of great photos showing the difference.
Really? I did not see this written anywhere. Do you have a link for this info?
What info? No AR on cyclops? I doubt Rolex would describe their crystal as "Sapphire crystal with ther absense of anti glare coating".
AR told me the cyclops doesnt have any AR coating, but I will see by myself when I have it.
Lol, attention world, our watches are even more basic now. But dont worry they will cost more. Haha
Yes and they also had a bunch of the gen 116610 as well but they still got it wrong. So I need to tell them how exactly they have to make the crystal like.
And the gen 41sub doesnt have AR on the cylcops anymore.
Yeah I cant stop thinking Rolex is intentionally making their watches easier to replicate.
Dear Angus, if they, with a gen in hand, in ten years have not been able to put a good crystal with a good Ar and good black hole on the cyclops, why would they now be able to create a good black hole effect by giving it a photo of a gen? come on, mate, let's not fool ourselves. the truth is that as long as no factory will put a good crystal with a good black hole effect Arf has no interest in doing this. in fact, as you wrote above, the new sub Arf v.4 will have a vr movement, because obviously ZZf is taking away a large slice of the market with its beautiful excellent ootb subs. when ZZf or other strong competitor will put a crystal with a good black hole then Arf will do it too. instead, in the old sub 16610, where Arf has no rival, Arf will continue to put that shit of Sh movement, as people buy it anyway. Same goes for the Datejust (although the new Vrf Dj41 seem very well made and, therefore, I think they will take away a good slice of the market from Arf).
What info? No AR on cyclops? I doubt Rolex would describe their crystal as "Sapphire crystal with ther absense of anti glare coating".
AR told me the cyclops doesnt have any AR coating, but I will see by myself when I have it.
I saw several YT videos showing the new Rollies and they looked like having an AR coating.
They wouldnt but I am trying to make them will.
To do what? the Ar on the cyclops or to put a vr movement in other models as well, in addition to the sub v.4?
It doesnt look like a strong AR to me, if there is an AR coating
Thats the whole point, no AR on cyclops and you have a black hole effect
Since the dial is now black so the "black" could be the dial color, need to see the gen, will get it from ARF in a couple of days