jeevanpillai
Active Member
- 10/9/16
- 313
- 0
- 16
Does that power reserve indicator work? Is that how simple the power reserve indicator is in the gen[emoji28]?No, that's the new clone P.9001 movement from VSF.
Sent from the RWI mobile app
Does that power reserve indicator work? Is that how simple the power reserve indicator is in the gen[emoji28]?No, that's the new clone P.9001 movement from VSF.
Does that power reserve indicator work? Is that how simple the power reserve indicator is in the gen[emoji28]?
Sent from the RWI mobile app
Oh wow. Thanks for that info. I've got a question, why was the making of a clone movement necessary? Was it for the the sake of thickness? What was the problem with the A7750?No, the indication is just faux, unfortunately.
You need a lot more gears for a working PR indicator
This is how the gen P.9001 PR indicator looks
Yes Mark
That is really weird
This dial looks really good
It is the same dial of KW-V6Fac but with correct inscriptions colour
ALE
IMO I think it is acceptable and ok. Maybe @chris3007 can chim in haha.Sorry for not asking direct questions. It seems like there are scratches some scratches / marks on the case and a lot of reflection (i'm not sure if this due to the lights in the room or the flash used by the camera)? how about +11 s/d is this acceptable?
Sorry for not asking direct questions. It seems like there are scratches some scratches / marks on the case and a lot of reflection (i'm not sure if this due to the lights in the room or the flash used by the camera)? how about +11 s/d is this acceptable?
Because it is the essence of the hobby. Why do we need the slight chamfer on the CG on the PAM111 from V2 to V3/V4? Why is the shape of the lugs on the PAM1312 changed so quickly from V1 to V3? Simply because they were on the gen, and we are always striving to close the gap between our reps and their gen counterparts. The A7750 is a veritable rep workhorse, being used on so many reps not only PAMs and its thickness is not an impediment to PAM reps using them to achieve gen thickness. But the A7750 (and the ST2555) have always had the inaccuracy of the balance wheel not being on the 7 o'clock mark. This is especially important to those models with display casebacks such as the PAM312 and PAM441. That's what's essentially keeping them from reaching super rep status (at least low-level, as there is still the function matter of the P.9000 specific functions as well as the 24hr GMT, which is an inaccuracy on 12hr GMT models).Oh wow. Thanks for that info. I've got a question, why was the making of a clone movement necessary? Was it for the the sake of thickness? What was the problem with the A7750?
Sent from the RWI mobile app
Because it is the essence of the hobby. Why do we need the slight chamfer on the CG on the PAM111 from V2 to V3/V4? Why is the shape of the lugs on the PAM1312 changed so quickly from V1 to V3? Simply because they were on the gen, and we are always striving to close the gap between our reps and their gen counterparts. The A7750 is a veritable rep workhorse, being used on so many reps not only PAMs and its thickness is not an impediment to PAM reps using them to achieve gen thickness. But the A7750 (and the ST2555) have always had the inaccuracy of the balance wheel not being on the 7 o'clock mark. This is especially important to those models with display casebacks such as the PAM312 and PAM441. That's what's essentially keeping them from reaching super rep status (at least low-level, as there is still the function matter of the P.9000 specific functions as well as the 24hr GMT, which is an inaccuracy on 12hr GMT models).
Just got mine today:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Congratulations.
But are there any second hand wobbling issues?
If you shake the watch, does the second hand move a little bit?
Congratulations.
But are there any minute hand wobbling issues?
If you shake the watch, does the minute hand move a little bit?