How many times have you seen a VSF sub next to a real one and how many times have you seen a CF version?
Considering you already said you have never seen the real one I’m going with none.
1. Not so long ago I was able to find 126619lb in the store. And yes, rehaut on gen is completely different, shiny, when on vsf it is gray matte and glitters only if very bright sun hits it.
2. Even when I came to this forum and asked questions, I was told that yes, rehaut on vsf is not as good as clean. And this is noticeable in the comparative photos of clean vs vsf
3. Open any vsf and gen comparison video or any photo (even chrono24) and you can see how the rehaut on gen shines 360 degrees, while vsf will be gray or only one side where the sun hits will shine.
4. There are constantly posts about polishing rehaut on vsf to give it a shine and make it look like gen.
5. Yes, I don't understand anything about watches, but I have eyes and I can see the difference in some details. Or do you want to tell me now that just all gen and clean are photographed so successfully that the whole rehaut glitters, and all vsf are shot so unsuccessfully (even when two watches are lying next to each other) that its rehaut is gray or only one side glitters?))
6. A bunch of people write that rehaut vsf is gray sh*t
P.S. I realized a long time ago that there is a vsf fan forum here, because clean is not even discussed here) And the fans pretend that they don't see any problems (and then they sit and polish rehaut xD) vsf sub is a great watch, I really like them, but their rehaut looks bad. Just like complete sh*t their double protective clasp