swissaddict
Renowned Member
- 6/3/08
- 968
- 3
- 0
@LoS... if other members feel as I do, then they certainly do care about this issue. I have been hesitant to post anything, because I figured an avalanche of discussion in this thread from many members would muddy the important issues and make it less likely for Andrew to give an adequate response. But now I will add my opinion here.
RWI may not have the ability to protect bullied dealers, or to stop the ones who are doing the bullying. I believe RWI members account for a very, very small share of replica sales, even from our popular dealers. However, this particular thread is not about a greater mission of influencing major change in the market or reforming corrupt business practices; it is about taking a stand based on the belief that fair competition in the replica market is beneficial to our membership, and that the alleged practices are harmful to our membership.
So, I would like to have the allegations confirmed or denied by the accused. I think the open request for Andrew to 'respond to the allegations' is not direct enough; it leaves too much room for evasion.
I am now asking Andrew directly: Did you, or did you not contact Hont in the past two weeks? If so, what was the content of this communication? And did you, or did you not ask a factory/supplier to stop selling to Hont?
RWI may not have the ability to protect bullied dealers, or to stop the ones who are doing the bullying. I believe RWI members account for a very, very small share of replica sales, even from our popular dealers. However, this particular thread is not about a greater mission of influencing major change in the market or reforming corrupt business practices; it is about taking a stand based on the belief that fair competition in the replica market is beneficial to our membership, and that the alleged practices are harmful to our membership.
So, I would like to have the allegations confirmed or denied by the accused. I think the open request for Andrew to 'respond to the allegations' is not direct enough; it leaves too much room for evasion.
I am now asking Andrew directly: Did you, or did you not contact Hont in the past two weeks? If so, what was the content of this communication? And did you, or did you not ask a factory/supplier to stop selling to Hont?