I called you stupid, a noob, an idiot. I told you to go drink piss.
And you just laid out for us exactly why I said that.
In the above quoted text that you got from my post on RepGeek, I was referring to the JLC NSD.
I was praising the new JLC rep for being 1:1. The flat numeral flaw on the prototype aside.
A flaw that was addressed by Angus as correctable in an estimated 6-9 months with an updated dial.
Itself being strong reason why I recommended the JLC over the V3 Diver. The NSD is a more accurate rep than the V3 Diver and I listed why.
What at all does that post have to do with the uncorrectable flaws on the V3 Diver?
You copy/pasted that post in an effort to defend comments that you made over everyone on RepGeek "scrutinizing" the AR'D cyclops, the wrong movement and the poor lume.
If anything you're the f****** hypocrite.
For criticizing those more passionate about the 1:1 aspects of their reps on another board; and then taking a shot at me for what you (wrongly) thought was the same opinion as your own.
You went on RepGeek to find the V3's imperfections in the V4 thread, and then you came back here to criticize our efforts.
You're reading up about flaws on a watch you don't even plan to purchase (or have ever even seen for that matter), and then you come here to
say: "those arguments boil my piss".
And then when someone calls you out on your B.S. you get defensive.
Dude you're talking about a thread on RepGEEK. What do you think we're going to talk about?
Maybe you should copy/paste all the threads over there and post them in here if you find them so interesting?
When you do, just know there are enough members here to call you out when you start to badmouth us.
:sparta:
:sparta:???? Really?
Go back to ******* repgeek you troll.
You are quite the special type of idiot, aren't you?
icard:
