@WatchN3RD
I was naively hoping the chemical plating would work.
I don’t know if photoresist would stick to a patinad surface or a black chromate surface. I will have to find out. It might not make it possible to treat the dial first then remove the negative image. Who knows. Guess one of us has to try the photoresist part! However it would stick to say an already zinc plated dial a la the chemical planting method. I will have to try.
Why I knew toner wasn’t the end all be all I knew it could do a lot. The limitation so far is the acids that look like it make it swell slightly. I will test today with toner transfer AND electroplating. I am hoping that there is no interaction and the zinc plating locks the toner in place giving it no room to swell
For pursuing photoresist on my side I’m focusing on either resin MSLA printer which uses UV light and a led screen. The mask is on the led screen itself so you don’t need to print anything out. The one I am looking at has the equivalent of 1,200isg dpi.
If I am feeling up to it I would make something like this
Learn how to use photolithography to shrink a design by as much as a factor of 40.
www.allaboutcircuits.com
Basically a light source and your mask get condensed by a focal lense and that image gets sent through another smaller reducing lens (aka an old microscope). This is how microchips are made. You can get incredibly complex, detailed images burned onto a photo resistant film and the are measured not in mm but um (micrometers). I had a chat with a researcher at Rice university about this. They thought it might by be over kill but it would work. They think the resin printer or the standard way of a uv light would work.
I want to go the resin printer route because it locks in the variables of Light power, distance from the light so all I have to worry about is time.