It's a CanonTS6351aGreat job, the print is really not bad. May I ask which printer you use?
I still want better, but I'm pretty impressed with my laser prints at 600 x 1200 dpi. 2500 sounds really good, but I don't know how to compare it against something like a photo negative. I'm so behind on my negative enlarger tests!@janneau what dpi don’t print at. I’m looking to make a photomask and it will be at 2500 dpi. Hoping that provides enough resolution
A photo negative has “no” dpi is what I have read. It’s already super high res. For 2500 dpi chat gpt tells me I should have minimum detail of less than .01mm which is pretty much as small as you can see with slight magnification. It’s like the tiny serif point on the a piece of text.I still want better, but I'm pretty impressed with my laser prints at 600 x 1200 dpi. 2500 sounds really good, but I don't know how to compare it against something like a photo negative. I'm so behind on my negative enlarger tests!
Well done! I've been planning a few clocks myself; just too lazy with the watch problems always on my plate. I'm definitely a vintage electric clock sucker though. Nice work.
Personally, I'm quite happy with the dg3804, it doesn't pose any problems. And I even think it has an unjustified bad image. On the other hand, I hate the hz, which is poorly designed, and the most annoying thing for me is the date change, which is really down-market.I know they're cheap, but the keyless works on the 2813 and 3804s are the worst.
You get the dial and hands set, remove the stem to put the movement in the case, and when you put the stem back in, the winding pinion has somehow done a 180.