I don't understand why people are so critical of OP's work here.
It's true he took lots of inspiration from the original NWBIG list to start this thread. However, he did not copy and paste wholesale, he added his own input, took multiple user's comments into consideration, did his own research before coming back to discuss about whether it should be added into the list.
I'm not saying the initial thread didn't take a lot of effort to reach the point where they were able to come up with consolidated list where most people agreed upon with the concensus that they were NWBIG.
In my opinion, that thread were more about experienced members having a discussion about whether certain watches were NWBIG while this thread is more targeted towards newer members who just wanted a simple list they could follow to get good watches they wanted, which in my opinion, the original thread didn't do a good job of since every other page there would be people (mostly noobs) asking where the list is.
Both threads are targeted to their own audience and both require effort to upkeep.
Let's stop arguing with each other about plagiarism and remember why we are all on this forum, to have a discussion about great reps and to have great reps.
Cheers!
Sent from the RWI App
Thanks man ! Sending you a PM.