Not sure, but apparently yes.
Hmm.... So can a rep with 1,5mm more thinkess be really a super rep? Damn, i love this watch :detective2:
Sub dial spacing is larger on the rep (1mm difference?) and the movement is obviously fake from the clear case back. Everything else I believe is spot on.If it's the only flaw, of course, since we're talking about a tell you can spot easily and I highly doubt there is anyone with a ruler that knows the real dimensions and will start measuring your watch...
Of course if there are other flaws, this need to be discussed.
Blindness again. You don't see (or most probably don't wanna see) the point.
And you speak about arrogance. That's funny.
Again, I gave credit to everyone who did the initial work.
You dude should learn about the spirit of cooperation, mate. I spent a lot of time to do this and review every watch of the original list, which was already copy-pasted mix from other lists. And what did you say about the fact it already was based on other people's work ? Nothing. You know why ? Because this is what cooperation means : sharing of knowledge, meaning please stop crying when someone tries to enhance what already exists. Humanity and families are built on cooperation. Nobody owns knowledge or information. Those who want to do that are just selfish, even funnier that you try to do that on a forum that is dedicated to use other people's knowledge and work.
The problem is always the same with people like you. What are you jealous about ? I'm not doing this for fame. I'm actually trying to help.
You're not happy ? Great, I respect that. But there is very good feedback about this thread, most people shown support and told they enjoy it, only 2 people whining, and you think you're right ? You're the minority here.
Even the author of the original thread didn't complain. He came, added constructive input and I even quoted it into the original post.
Now please, stop complaining and let us keep this thing going. You're not welcome if you're not constructive. Wanna cooperate ? Great, you'll be more than welcome. Didn't you say "I will help and participate with pleasure" a few posts ago ? That was probably a lie, wasn't it ? I've been answering every single post here, taking all opinions into consideration, checking all the things people suggested, editing the list every time something could be improved, even started private discussions with people who know a lot better than me on some brands, for example with @JackJ1980 for Blancpain.
People like you only like to destroy and hate, so I won't waste my time with you mate.
Now please, get out of this thread or you will ridicule yourself.
Outstanding ! Thanks for sharing. I recently added a Noob V7 Smurf to my rep collection. Given the fact that repping
a $23k white gold using steel is ballsy, IMHO I think it's done very well. Would appreciate fellow members thoughts on it.
Outstanding ! Thanks for sharing. I recently added a Noob V7 Smurf to my rep collection. Given the fact that repping
a $23k white gold using steel is ballsy, IMHO I think it's done very well. Would appreciate fellow members thoughts on it.
If you allude to me, I did not criticize the initiative but the place you choose for it.
I will help and participate with pleasure, the very moment you will stop piggybacking on other people's ideas and efforts without giving credit.
Sent from the RWI App
Yes it could be. But it also could be the case that in the first instance you make your own list and effort, than you can pass to the phase when you can give suggestions to others.This could have been a different but nice and respectful angle:
"Hey @Omagad, what a hell of a job you did by investigating the existing materials, analyzing all reviews, reading existing topics, reaching out & giving credit to other members and come with this new & improved list. Awesome and deep respect mate. I must admit that I'm a bit jealous of you because you actually delivered a very comprehensive up-to-date overview, which is already trending because the community likes it so much. I was only thinking about creating such a list like this for a while but never came to this level of execution. Hats off for you. How can I support you and the forum to fine tune the list?"
Kindest regards,
Simonjay
Sent from the RWI mobile app
There has been much whining about the creation of this thread. However, the benefits have been clear. Several people are giving thanks and others are pitching in.This could have been a different but nice and respectful angle:
"Hey @Omagad, what a hell of a job you did by investigating the existing materials, analyzing all reviews, reading existing topics, reaching out & giving credit to other members and come with this new & improved list. Awesome and deep respect mate. I must admit that I'm a bit jealous of you because you actually delivered a very comprehensive up-to-date overview, which is already trending because the community likes it so much. I was only thinking about creating such a list like this for a while but never came to this level of execution. Hats off for you. How can I support you and the forum to fine tune the list?"
Kindest regards,
Simonjay
Sent from the RWI mobile app
As a new guy I really appreciate all the information being put forth and condensed like this as it was a bit of a slog looking through the original posts like this dating years back.
So so useful
Omagad, Thank you for your work. This list will be very helpful. I cast my vote for the Sea Dweller 4K as a super-rep. Gen to rep comparison: https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/rolex-sd4000-116600-gen-comparison-a-bks-noob-v2.328014/
Hey mate, this is BK's work. Right ? Not really an "out of the box" rep.
Thanks for the support, much appreciated.
Yes you are correct. The reason I shared the link was to point out how good most Noob SD4K's are out of the box, but I fell short of the message I was trying to convey, so here is another review of a Noob V2 vs Gen: https://forum.replica-watch.info/threads/seadweller-116600-gen-vs.317929/