r0b9502
Renowned Member
- 22/1/17
- 913
- 305
- 63
@mysterio it is really good that you panerastees (including ALE) are commenting on this thread! That legitimizes the thread!!
To business, 569 is not a super rep in ALEs list. It was classified as "close" to super rep. From what I checked last. I have it. With profound but unfounded opinion, I too declare it as not super rep. Perhaps you guys can elaborate why? And remove from this list )
To business, 569 is not a super rep in ALEs list. It was classified as "close" to super rep. From what I checked last. I have it. With profound but unfounded opinion, I too declare it as not super rep. Perhaps you guys can elaborate why? And remove from this list )
Unless ALL samples of a certain watch had it, you could not use noise to disqualify. It could just be a problem with your watch. As far as your what-if scenario goes, it's pretty unlikely (3 people who assumed your 15400 was real, so most likely well to do people, blindfolded in a well sound-insulated car). Well, unless you were a kidnapper at which point whether your watch was noisy or not would be the least of their concerns. :lmao: