QC pics are a load of bullshit that should never have happened.
Name me one other game where you get this kind of thing.
Worst idea ReplicaMake ever had. Where is Robert when we need him?
He never succumbed to these things and neither did D4M.
I've been reading this thread with interest and posted earlier to say that I thought this was a bit of a naughty trick being pulled by either a TD, his/her employee or someone at the factory.
The more I come to think about it, the more I agree with TB and sympathise with the TDs, as well as the OP.
Is setting out to trick someone wrong? Yes, no issues with stating that, however, why has someone felt the need to do this?
In my eyes it is to do with the point rasied by TB above. I'm sure 99% of reps have a flaw which is not 'designed in', i.e. left over from the manufacturing process rather than CGs which are too short, lettering too high on the dial, etc.. In a perfect world, the TD hand selects a watch
which meets their standards, which are no doubt based on an inspection using the Mk1 Human Eyeball and their knowledge of the model and factory. I'm pretty sure they can't spend an hour looking at each watch, so a swift but thorough look over is all it gets.
They then take macro, high res images of it to send to us, and this is where the problems start... What they couldn't see either without a loupe or without spending all day looking at every single detail now "jumps off the screen" to an eagerly awaiting watch geek, who then wants another one when 15 other people have pointed out every speck of dust on the dial! In reality these 'flaws' are invisible during normal use.
Don't think I'm trivialising the issue here, in my opinion, people have been less than honest in an industry which only works (at the TD to customer end) when everyone is seen to be honest, and this is a problem.
As TB says, this is all down to QC pics, I don't request them and I don't hold any real faith in them, how do you even know it is your watch? If my TD says the watch is ok, it has always been good enough for me, if I deal with someone in the future and his/her standards don't meet mine, I won't deal with them again.
It annoys me when people say "get real, its a rep" or "you're expecting gen quality" as I don't believe people are, they simply want what they've seen advertised on a website or in a picture on this forum, and a mark on the dial, pube under the crystal or an off-centre pearl are not that, so we have a duty to raise a flag if we receive goods which are not 'as advertised', as this (as others have rightly pointed out) is how the rep industry has improved its standards, and failing to do so would invite a slip.
This is a no-win situation for the TDs as far as I'm concerned, if they get so picky that they reject everything a factory has to offer, the prices will go up (which we all moan about), however, if they accept something with a very minor (even invisible to the naked eye) flaw which is then visible in a QC pic, they get moaned at by us!
My solution would be for TDs to only send QC pics if they see a flaw which MIGHT be detectable in normal use, then the customer can either accept, refuse or negotiate a discount. Failing that, lets start paying them for an additional detailed inspection. I'd give my TD an extra $20 for him to spend 30 minutes really looking at a watch and assuring me that there are either no visible flaws, or giving me the details of anything he has see. Full disclosure which no one can then argue with.
As a case in point, I noticed a chunk of debris on my PAM 292 dial the other day. I've had the watch over a year and this has always been there. Did I get QC pics? No. Did I notice it when I received the watch? No. Am I going to try to send it back? No. Will anyone in the real world ever notice it, even if I let them handle the watch? No. Does it now bug me? YES! However, it doesn't stop me wearing a watch I love and I'll take the movement out one day and remove it.
This is a 'game' which is about building relationships at every level. I'm fortunate enough to now have a dealer I trust, who gives me what I consider to be good advice and has sent me what I've asked for every time and, if I do ever have a problem, I'm pretty sure he'd sort out with minimum fuss.
As far as I'm concerend, these debates are healthy when conducted in the right way (as I think the OP intended), and both buyers and TDs can take a lot away from them, however, they are pointless when they end up as name calling and mud slinging contests.