- 18/12/09
- 2,599
- 1,869
- 113
Aren’t those maxi hands? Maybe you used a Kermit RAF as a base (the Kermit had maxi hands and maxi dial instead of the regular 5-digit dial & hands).
Aren’t those maxi hands? Maybe you used a Kermit RAF as a base (the Kermit had maxi hands and maxi dial instead of the regular 5-digit dial & hands).
hour markers are creamy off white and hands are white?
And you GL quickly
Call my crazy I might ask for the BPHont in a rush before Chinese new yearalso the hands and markers difference is just how this batch of ARFs are sadly, not an RL issue cause it won't be different on another one.
Yeah I went with BP for the 16610lnCall my crazy I might ask for the BP
There are always pros and cons. If you want to Franken and do lots of mods, the ARF is probably your best bet but if you just want it ootb as a beater, the BP might be the best choice. Up to you what you can live with and not.What are the pros/cons of ARF vs BP? Which is best OOTBIs anyone able to summarise their knowledge? Digging through both threads and it's not clear to me
![]()
this is something that i can't decide on either....not sure there's a clear winnerWhat are the pros/cons of ARF vs BP? Which is best OOTBIs anyone able to summarise their knowledge? Digging through both threads and it's not clear to me
![]()
I got a Clark’s xtal coated with clear AR via an optician. I think it distorts the cyclops which already had AR coating. Might look better if I actually had it installedI reached out to Clark about a month ago and asked for a full AR no-cyclops 295 and he said it was in the works. So, hopefully soon we will see one available.