Maybe best to combine the VSF bracelet with the ARF clasp then.I think different springbars won’t fix that… a gap means SEL width is a tiny bit shorter than lug width
Amazing that after getting and living with the VSF this still holds true!Same basic watch, same small HEV, same cringe SELs, same wonderful CGs tho, and same wonderful insert.
The lugs feel small and pointy in hand, and the bracelet is no match for the ARF (V3 or 4)
The best possible version would be an ARF V4 with reshaped CG’s and XF/VSF insert. ARF V4 crystal is the best I’ve seen yet, and almost negates the need for Gen.
XF and ARF dials are now both near perfect, proper color, proper finish, proper markers, fonts fixed on all (serif on “1” correct on both now, no more floating “m” either)
Some XF/VSF still have the 3x cyclops, some don’t. Early ARF’s also had this issue.
ARF HEV is the right size on all versions, measured against Gen. XF/VSF hev color is better (darker) but looks wonky cause it’s so small when next to ARF and Gen.
Gen dials are impossible to find, and when found are 2k USD (or damaged) Gen inserts are impossible to find, and when found are priced to the moon or broken. Gen crystals can be found, but are 600+ USD. Gen hands are not needed on either the latest XF/VSF nor the ARF V4.
That’s should help the confusion of what’s best and why.
No, the lugs are too far apart, you’d need wider SELs, and when installing the ARF bracelet (hoping it would fill the gaps) it did not. I’ll measure them to illustrate at some point.Can the SELS gap be fixed with different springbars?
Nope, the gap is worse with VSF bracelet, which is why I tried the ARF, and while it’s a tad better, you can still see the spring bars IN THE GAP on the wrist.Maybe best to combine the VSF bracelet with the ARF clasp then.
Yes, i ask first, so thank you, then i can provide to high res pic.Need a better high res pic bud. But I can tell from this distance the right one is indeed an ARF case, and the left and middle are the XF/VSF cases (lug shapes are a tell)
I need to see the bezel teeth closer and insert pearls.
Just looks like stock XF/VSF/ARF watches from this angle. And I’d be suspicious of the ARF with 3235 claim, open it and see.
Also, I’ll pay you stupid money for that gen crystal. Seriously.
The clasp code is 4RL and the dial has the crown.PS: if that watch on the right is a MK1 dial (no crown at 6 between SWISS and MADE) I’d say 100% that’s a Noob V3, and C4R should be the clasp code. I could be wrong, but that’s what the rehaut and crystal is telling me.
Sorry, not understand, but the pics of movement are of alleged ARF. I not yet opened the VSF.Oh man, I thought the pics would make it easier, and it’s made me think totally different thoughts, lol.
So while looking at the scallops, I can’t help but notice the angles of the rehaut and crystal edges, AND the mounting screws of the 3235 in the ARF. That looks like a VSF/XF crystal and rehaut, they are def different with the ARF. And I’m not aware of a 3235 in a VSF mounted with no tabs, so I assume that’s a modification which looks more like the mounting of the 3135 in a Gen. in the gen 126600 the 3235 has tabs holding it in. Like the gen Daytona 4130 now also.
This is tough to discern, and honestly I’d need to really hold them to figure this all out.
My best assessment is that other 126600 with 3235 is not ARF, it’s the OG Noob 126600. Send the clasp code, that will prove me right or wrong lol.