As for the video, keep in mind that this is a professional camera with a large sensor, which gives much more detail. In front of a standard camera. In reality the hands look much better
Agree a great piece , it's definitely on the want to buy list
As for the video, keep in mind that this is a professional camera with a large sensor, which gives much more detail. In front of a standard camera. In reality the hands look much better
As for the video, keep in mind that this is a professional camera with a large sensor, which gives much more detail. In front of a standard camera. In reality the hands look much better
Yes, VSF bezel markings are slightly shorter.
But I am with Jayalvin777 - the VSF bezel seems better than the original
Remember, these are marcro shots. You won't be able to tell much difference in the wrist.
Cheers
That looks good and excellent pics. Thank you.
I am not terribly familiar with the tiny details of this model in gen but the hour hand looks longer than Rolex typically uses.
In 6 digit ceramic models (not including the 2020 models because I haven't looked at them closely enough) but Rolex usually uses a hand that juuuusssttt reaches the reaches the 3, 6, 9 12 markers. Like just touches.
I don't know if every model does this. But most models I've looked at closely do tend to do this.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
These hand macros really spell out how different the hands are. People always talk about Rolex hands having a more 3D effect but it seems, looking at the macros, that it's achieved to a significant degree by simply having the lume recessed below the level of the gold/metal. Are Gen hands deeper? I appreciate the measurements would be tiny, but has anyone ever measured the depth of Gen hands and compared them to rep?
I think if it was the same camera and the same lens the difference would have looked less significant. And the same lighting..very affects the overall look
