Last edited:
Nice observation, certainly one that me passed by. Shows how sharp I look!
As I own the Gen it made it a bit easier to compare. I was able to examine the rep picture and the Gen in my hand at the same timeNice observation, certainly one that me passed by. Shows how sharp I look!
Right well I better get saving then - I've always wanted the gen, and having this on wrist is just awesome. What a great watchAs I own the Gen it made it a bit easier to compare. I was able to examine the rep picture and the Gen in my hand at the same time
Definitely a great watch, it perfectly combines the tooly 5 digits with the quality of the 6-digit subsRight well I better get saving then - I've always wanted the gen, and having this on wrist is just awesome. What a great watch
It's a gl from me, but that's me!I think I will give a pass on this one. Should I red light this, what do you guys think?
I can’t see anything why you should RL this. The pearl looks similar to all others for me
It's a gl from me, but that's me
The pearl is crap on all Reps of this I’ve seen until now, so more a batch error.Thanks for taking a look. I appreciate the feedback! My main concern was that the pearl seemed noticeably lower than the gen, and that the 12 o'clock marker quite a bit off-center especially compared to other replicas I've seen. I want to make sure it won’t bother me long-term. Do you guys think it’s within acceptable tolerance, or am I overthinking it?
They'll be sitting on this for a while, I agree. For a first attempt, I think it's pretty darn goodI wouldn't hold my breath for an update.
It’s on my long list even as a v1. But first, I need 8 more Daytonas lolThey'll be sitting on this for a while, I agree. For a first attempt, I think it's pretty darn good
it's fine