- 30/9/06
- 11,730
- 1,451
- 113
I got a so called VSF 126610 LV yesterday from a friend. He bought the watch middle of November. I do not know the source and it was not a TD from RWI. I already have a VSF Hulk and a 126610 LN.
Now comparing the LV with the other VSF I already have, I believe the watch is a fake VSF.
Here are my points
1) Bezel klick sounds different. But turn is good
2) 1.8 mm springboard used, therefore the SELs move a little
3) loupe is different, Date looks dark, date fond is thicker, date Window is smaller?
4) My LN has the VSF 3235 movement, the LV has the new one.
5) SELs are not sunken, they are the same height as the lugs.
Overall feeling is not too bad the real VSF feel better. Winding etc….
Now some pics
LN with clear date
LV, date looks funny to me
movement comparison, left my LN with VSF3225 movement from Feb batch.
Clasp code looks correct on the LV.
VSF Hulk on the right side. Overall feeling incl SEL and date window like gen. Very good quality.
Sent from my iPad via Tapa
Now comparing the LV with the other VSF I already have, I believe the watch is a fake VSF.
Here are my points
1) Bezel klick sounds different. But turn is good
2) 1.8 mm springboard used, therefore the SELs move a little
3) loupe is different, Date looks dark, date fond is thicker, date Window is smaller?
4) My LN has the VSF 3235 movement, the LV has the new one.
5) SELs are not sunken, they are the same height as the lugs.
Overall feeling is not too bad the real VSF feel better. Winding etc….
Now some pics
LN with clear date
LV, date looks funny to me
movement comparison, left my LN with VSF3225 movement from Feb batch.
Clasp code looks correct on the LV.
VSF Hulk on the right side. Overall feeling incl SEL and date window like gen. Very good quality.
Sent from my iPad via Tapa