Well, as I said before I respect your opinion
How could you call a TC a super clone if it doesn’t house a clone of a gen movement, it’s not a clone at all.
The 116610 case there’s still things not 100% with Gen with it. It’s has more wokky shaped Rehaut for instance.
I think for every thing found wrong on the 126 we can find something for the 116.
Someone should shoot that point out and list the differences for both (non biased of course) I’d be interested to see if that’s the case.
I’d regard both as super clones they are whole clones of the genuine watches albeit with small differences.
Clones in a biological sense are never exact copies anyway. (Maybe I’m going off the point)
If a TC with minor differences in case bracelet xtal hands etc was a ‘super rep’ then these VSFs with thier Gen clone (spec/interchangeable with gen parts) movements are definitely super clones.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well I was going by the aesthetics of a watch. The TC and 116610 are super clones on the outside. They are genlike without opening the caseback. If you want to consider movement in a superclone discussion then sure, the TC is not a superclone.
If we're talking about aesthetics, they beat the 126610.
The 116610 has a weird rehaut but so do gens a lot of the time. It's not like Gens with off rehauts are not gens anymore. No one can look at a 116610 by VSF and say it's not a Rolex cause of the rehaut. You can look at the lugs of the 126610 and say it's not a Rolex cause of the different case shape... the comparison is worlds apart and is a false equivalency IMO.
I think for every thing found wrong on the 126 we can find something for the 116.
Going to have to hard disagree here. The 126610 by VSF relative to the gen lacks AR, easy tell right there. The lug shape is different. The dial size is still up for debate. But lacking AR and different case shape can't possibly be allowed in a super clone discussion. You can't possibly compare an misaligned rehaut on the 116610 which many gens have, against a different case/lug shape on the 126610 relative to the gen...
Again I'm sure the 126610 feels very premium and high quality. VSF is known for that. But it can't be a clone, aka an exact copy, if the case VSF is using, has a different shape, which means it isn't an exact copy... aka not a clone.
Last edited: