Klockis is absalutly correct, its really a sad matter that some people can display such outright audacity.
Here you have two well respected members, who for the most part, are the go to guys for anything PAM related on this board. They have jobs, families and personal lives away from this place, yet they still find time to prepare detailed reviews that to my knowledge do not exist in any other watches sub forum. Not to offend the rolex area, or IWC area, but none of these places have a review guides that are as complete and as up to date as our PAM Section.
People dont realize that because of these detailed reviews, countless members have been able to research and find the best watches for themselves over and over. Would you all rather go back to having people ask what the best pam is every 20 seconds? Comments that were made in this thread were entirely uncalled for and disrespectful. Things like this can discourage future reviews and then what about the rest of us, we would all be Sh*t out of luck.
I am hoping that there were misunderstanding due to language barriers/translations, and not just simple disrespect. Ale/Klockis have done an outstanding job showing the positives and the negatives of these watches, in terms of aspects that have been reviewed to date.
I think i speak for the mass majority when i say that we value the tremendous effort and detail that was put into this review. So much talk, but so little action - if any of you think this was biased, feel free to provide us with your own detailed reviews that will undoubtedly lack the quality and precision that was provided by these two guru's.
+1 the time and effort put into this is priceless. I was never into Pams until now. Can't wait to get my hands on one. GREAT WORK GUYS!!!