It’s ok to be weak this time, mateLooking Forward! I dont know how Long i can control myself haha
It’s effing awesome!
It’s ok to be weak this time, mateLooking Forward! I dont know how Long i can control myself haha
Strap won't smell the vanilla (à la HFac) but it should be goodI may need to grab one of these also. How’s the strap quality?
I have the Gen 024 (same like 1024 except the updated movement). No fisheye.A question for the wise people of the forum, the Pam 1024 gen had the
fish eye effect Crystal?
Thank you very muchI have the Gen 024 (same like 1024 except the updated movement). No fisheye.
Still love it despite its flaws!I am sorry @aHero
Also mine got in my hands yesterday. I am happy with it. Still need to compare to my best replicas to check how accurate at least the case is. First thing I notices the crown guard shape (sideways) is wrong.
But the object is a beaut. Will post some pictures later or when the weekend hits.
Curious which part of the CG is off in your opinion from the side, is it the lever shape?I am sorry @aHero
Also mine got in my hands yesterday. I am happy with it. Still need to compare to my best replicas to check how accurate at least the case is. First thing I notices the crown guard shape (sideways) is wrong.
But the object is a beaut. Will post some pictures later or when the weekend hits.
If you look at the post in this thread on the firs page "Gen vs Rep", you'll notice that when looked sideways the gen CG has a distinct triangle shape on the upper part: fatter on the middle of the CG and thin at the end. Well this part is almost flat on the rep.Curious which part of the CG is off in your opinion from the side, is it the lever shape?
Interesting point. The case/bezel/dial etc. are the same between 024 and 1024 (they only updated the Movement a bit). You are right, the CG has this „lifted“ shape on the 1024 and also on the 024.If you look at the post in this thread on the firs page "Gen vs Rep", you'll notice that when looked sideways the gen CG has a distinct triangle shape on the upper part: fatter on the middle of the CG and thin at the end. Well this part is almost flat on the rep.
Here:
Oh wow, interesting then!Interesting point. The case/bezel/dial etc. are the same between 024 and 1024 (they only updated the Movement a bit). You are right, the CG has this „lifted“ shape on the 1024 and also on the 024.
However, I have a Gen 024 B-Series (1999/2000). These early version of the 024 have the bezel polished and T-Dial. The „later“ version of the 024 came with brushed bezel and SL dial.
The early 024 have also the „flat“ CG such as the VSF 1024, see here my Gen:
So it’s not totally-totally wrong coming from the 024 perspective. But if it bothers you, just change to a „lifted“ CG.