furtivedog
Known Member
- 2/8/06
- 163
- 1
- 0
Oh. Yeah. Uh. I just realized who "sub4me" is. Oh crap. This can't be good.
Actually rolex doesn't use regular steel and all parts are hand finished. And common of course there's a difference between 3135 and a standard grade eta let alone an Asian clone. Does a standard grade eta Ruan -1 to +4 in six different positions? If we are talking top grade eta tested in six positions that's a different story. But have you seen a rep with a top grade cosc certified eta 2824?
I mean how about just the difference between setting the time on a rolex or a omega movement versus an eta or especially asian clone. Worlds apart.
I dint even understand how you guys can argue this especially after handling the gen. But I guess it's all subjective. Driving a mercedes might not feel the same to one person as it does the other. Some people can perceive the difference while others do not. That's not a judgement.
Sent from the RWI mobile app
Good points and many more can also be made. I'm just not gonna try to explain it to some guy who thinks reps are of equal quality to top brand gens made in an entirely different way.
Which gen Rolex that you have owned do you like the most? The least?True some people will never understand.
There is no significant difference between a TC 16610 and a Rolex 16610
In fact the TC will have had a lot more care and attention put into it
There is no magic. Stainless steel is stainless steel . Rolex don't have fairy dust.
There is no significant difference between an ETA 2836 and a Rolex 3135 in terms of function and finish
One has a free sprung balance, which is in fact no significant advantage in timekeeping terms.
Read what Walt Odets had to say about Rolex movement quality many years ago, nothing has really changed.
Of course there are great watches which would be very difficult to emulate in terms of quality and function by the reppers.
But Rolex is absolutely not one of them IMHO.
http://www.timezone.com/2002/09/16/the-rolex-explorer-ref-14270-part-2/
Who was it that said reps are of "equal quality"? I've been reading this exchange for a couple of days, and I have yet to see such a thing.
Whoa. I dunno about that. The finish on a gen 3135 is bananas. The metal has an almost rainbow like twinkle to it. My top grade 2824 is gorgeous but not Rolex gorgeous. And the keyless system on the 28xx series leaves much to be desired. Again, I take your point that is a $2k 3135 "worth" 10x the $200 ETA? Maybe not. But the tech/materials/finish is worlds apart. Peace!
Which gen Rolex that you have owned do you like the most? The least?
Whoa. I dunno about that. The finish on a gen 3135 is bananas. The metal has an almost rainbow like twinkle to it. My top grade 2824 is gorgeous but not Rolex gorgeous. And the keyless system on the 28xx series leaves much to be desired. Again, I take your point that is a $2k 3135 "worth" 10x the $200 ETA? Maybe not. But the tech/materials/finish is worlds apart. Peace!
He said there was no significant difference. Read it however you want but he's completely wrong.
You wanna buy a rep and wear it as such fine buts don't go on pretending it's just as good as a gen because it's not.
This guys thinks there's no significant difference between reps and gens, lmfao.
This guys thinks there's no significant difference between some reps and gens, lmfao.
Interesting picture tim!I find it interesting that you say that.
Rolex don't use any magic materials for their watch movements and I actually find their finish pretty lacking I have had Keyless faults with GMT IIs it isn't uncommon. I think most other makers in that same mid price range as Rolex are finishing their movements much better. I would also say that any of the the ETA Elabore are probably overall slightly better finished.
BTW ( Couldn't resist ) This is a Rolex 3135 rotor axel after few years use, not so pretty eh!
It will need replacing This is about average for a 3135 They are OK but really not so great.
[/url]
The thread is in danger of turning into a Rolex is god or not .
My opening premise was that some reps are so good that IMO it is not worth buying the gen of that particular watch as you would derive from such a purchase no significant, visible or measurable advantage. So far a few people have tried to hit the premise with a hammer, I guess that's how some people function, but I am not hearing substantive and objective arguments from hands on experience to suggest the premise is anything but right.