- 24/10/17
- 3,522
- 5,720
- 113
Even the insert doesn't look too bad without the macro shots. Not brilliant, but passable. A good all round OTB option I reckon.
Even the insert doesn't look too bad without the macro shots. Not brilliant, but passable. A good all round OTB option I reckon.
No. The watch is very good, but insert is shit. Number engraving total wrong. Too thin.
Nice one mate! And with a genuine bezel assembly (and I assume insert too) you will upgrade one of the few things that don't look spot on. Now on the rehaut finish, I'm not so sure how to smoothen that a little bit but to be fair it's difficult to see in plain sight. The crystal, on the other hand... I would not change it for a genuine, it looks amazing (as many VRF do).
Guys i am a bit cunfused, wich one has the improved movement,
1-GMT-Master II 116710 LN Black Ceramic 904L Steel ARF 1:1 Best Edition SH3186 CHS
2-GMT-Master II 116710 LN Black Ceramic 904L Steel VRF 1:1 Best Edition SA3186 CHS
I thought it wos the arf cause ir says stable in the product info about the movement...
Ah, thanks! That cleared up.
Yeah that is my next move, find out about the movements. So there complete new movement not based on the 3135 or so?
https://puretimewatch.io/gmt-master...4l-steel-vrf-1-1-best-edition-sa3186-chs.html
This been posted elsewhere?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m sorry gents! Doing my best to do my due diligence here, however, when referring to the “insert” this is the dial correct? Also, can someone point me in the right direction to buy a gen bezel assembly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, the dial is the dial.
The insert refers to the bezel insert - ie the ceramic ring that has the silver triangle and the silver 2, 4, 6, 8 etc numbers on it.
There are threads on here with explanations of all watch words/terminology. Or JFGI.