Guys... I read somewhere here that a stem may fall off. Is there the stem problem until now?
Not sure I would take it to the pool, even if another one has tested his. Not sure if the QC from one watch to another, especially on rep, is accurate. Either you test it, or take the risk, or you don't.
The problem with waterproof watches, is they are tested without moving the watch. If you jump in water, even with 1m water, the pressure on the glass, the gasket etc is much higher than this 1m water. That's why they say 10m waterproof is meant to be able to resist a handwashing, and you need at least (not sure) 30 or 50m just to swim in the pool.
Therion666 Thank you for clarify. Bit confused between v1 and v2 and didnt know he is refering the different watch.
in my opinion the most significant flaw is the dial itself. if you compare it with the gen, the rep just cannot, no matter the lighting, replicate the greyish tone of the dial
Strangely when I swapped the movement to Swiss it became much more solid in feel and movement.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
https://imgur.com/a/S8ohtPZ this is a photo of the gen. Considering my photo was taken with strong light , I think your photo shows pretty much the same grey as on mine photo taken in AD some days back.
exactly, only that my photo shows a gen, not a rep, which emphasizes my whole point..
Yes. It might be, since I have v1 and looks okay.V1 is having it but not in such a quality.
Might also be just the photos.