As long as the PPF movement is less than a gen clutch. Otherwise the gen clutch is FAR more reliable. Issue is the teeth on the clutch of the rep are pretty fine, compared to the gen which have far more strength. Sorry this happened, way too common a fault.
Thanks buddy.
I haven’t looked further than comparing the pics of the gen vs the rep mvmt teardown clutch, but I’d be surprised if the gen is plug & play in the rep movement. They look different enough to cause issues. Love to know if someone has tried it though!
Yes that’s the issue. I’m not sure if anyone has tried it yet.
Before you buy, please check the CTime thread to see if they're even compatible!! Don't waste ya money just yet
Might be better to either :
- Buy a new 5712 to strip for spare parts, part out the watch, sell the rest
- Look into obtaining the new 1.5k free sprung super movement
Hello, everyone This time I bought the mini version of the original 5712 -- 5015 (the old version) at a huge cost. They have the same movement, the difference is that there is no PP engraving on the 5015 movement, and the end of the minute hand is not bronzed. The new 5712 minute hand has a...
forum.replica-watch.info
Thanks for the link. I can see they look pretty different the gen and rep part 407. Probably won’t fit.
I’ll ask the watchmaker how he thinks we should proceed.
First he broke my genuine moon phase (cost me 800€). Which he partly compensated by offering the mods free of charge. So I sent him a keylog74 moon phase, which I also paid for. This cost me around 950€ (his mods would’ve been 600€). So I took the extra hit.
Now this part broke while the watch was in his custody. I expect him to solve it.
I honestly don’t have a bank vault I can pull money out of, every time he breaks my watch. There must be some obligations towards customers when you are a Trusted Watchmaker on this forum.