You would probably recommend all the PAMs you have bro lol
Sent from my HTC 10
It's like having to pick a favorite among your children. It's impossible. :lol:
You would probably recommend all the PAMs you have bro lol
Sent from my HTC 10
True man hahaIt's like having to pick a favorite among your children. It's impossible. [emoji38]
Just received my 312 with the new clone movement, and I'll agree with all the previous assessments. The movement is very very close, but not perfectly accurate. I noticed the difference in the shape of the "notch" in the top plate (smoother flowing than the gen, which actually looks more awkward than the rep), and the axis end of the rotor which slightly protrudes into that open "notch" area, unlike the gen. Also visible, is the teeth of a gear at the 2:00 position, where the gen is smooth. The date wheel font seems slightly more off-white than the gen, as far as I can determine. Crown guard engravings maybe look a bit shallow, but I have nothing to compare it to except photos.
But don't let this dampen enthusiasm for this one. I'm extremely impressed with the gen-like feel and absolutely excellent finishing! I've had a few excellent PAM reps. A few years ago, I had a gen 111 and bought a Noob rep to wear daily in its place. The accuracy was so good, really had a hard time justifying keeping the gen (only on the front; that movement was an instant give-away), so I sold it. Then I replaced the rep 111 with a 243, which was supposed to be even more accurate, and became my new daily (even with its flaw: thin polished bezel edge). Honestly, this 312 "feels" as good as either of them, maybe even better, and far exceeds the average 'wrist test' for visual accuracy. I'd say that you'd have to be extremely familiar with the 312, 328, or the P9000 movement to call this one out, and no one is going to do that unless you hand them the watch.
Rep strap still sucks, IMHO. I have a new, high quality aftermarket on the way.
Just received my 312 with the new clone movement, and I'll agree with all the previous assessments. The movement is very very close, but not perfectly accurate. I noticed the difference in the shape of the "notch" in the top plate (smoother flowing than the gen, which actually looks more awkward than the rep), and the axis end of the rotor which slightly protrudes into that open "notch" area, unlike the gen. Also visible, is the teeth of a gear at the 2:00 position, where the gen is smooth. The date wheel font seems slightly more off-white than the gen, as far as I can determine. Crown guard engravings maybe look a bit shallow, but I have nothing to compare it to except photos.
But don't let this dampen enthusiasm for this one. I'm extremely impressed with the gen-like feel and absolutely excellent finishing! I've had a few excellent PAM reps. A few years ago, I had a gen 111 and bought a Noob rep to wear daily in its place. The accuracy was so good, really had a hard time justifying keeping the gen (only on the front; that movement was an instant give-away), so I sold it. Then I replaced the rep 111 with a 243, which was supposed to be even more accurate, and became my new daily (even with its flaw: thin polished bezel edge). Honestly, this 312 "feels" as good as either of them, maybe even better, and far exceeds the average 'wrist test' for visual accuracy. I'd say that you'd have to be extremely familiar with the 312, 328, or the P9000 movement to call this one out, and no one is going to do that unless you hand them the watch.
Rep strap still sucks, IMHO. I have a new, high quality aftermarket on the way.
Hi Beith,Here's my review. Watch overall is good. Quality of construction is good, case accuracy is good, CG well made, CG lever feels good, movement so far is solid with good PR, for the most part accuracy to gen is high - probably somewhere around a top first class rep near super rep status (imo).
Cons: DW font colour is too dark (biggest tell), date box is too deep, engraving on CG and caseback not deep enough, position of CG engraving slightly off, engraving on rotor and movement not crisp enough, movement very close but not entirely correct: escapement wheel position incorrect, jewels different, screws are different and a few other minor differences. Finally ofc, no P9000 functions. The buckle is inaccurate (for those who care): font slightly off, engraving not deep enough, edges too sharp, not as well polished as gen.
Overall, very good watch. Well constructed with good finishing. If you want better accuracy then you'll need a DW change, then it may be super rep status
Rep strap still sucks, IMHO. I have a new, high quality aftermarket on the way.
I"ve got one of these on the way - can you recommend a high quality aftermarket strap that is consistent in appearance with the 312?
Interesting thread, still not quite sure about the differences between the 9001 and the 9000.
I know he isn`t a trusted dealer here but Perfect Clones has a Pam382 Bronzo on his site with the P9000 movement, calling it not a mod of the 7750 but a new breed of movement.
I wasn`t so interested in the Panerai but am now looking closely at the Bronzo, or a ceramic version perhaps, as they look great.
Interesting thread, still not quite sure about the differences between the 9001 and the 9000.
I know he isn`t a trusted dealer here but Perfect Clones has a Pam382 Bronzo on his site with the P9000 movement, calling it not a mod of the 7750 but a new breed of movement.
I wasn`t so interested in the Panerai but am now looking closely at the Bronzo, or a ceramic version perhaps, as they look great.
P.9001 movement, as described in the same website.Functions
Hours, Minutes, Small Seconds, Date
The P.9000 movement mentioned in that dealer's website is the one used in the new PAM312 from VSF, a visually accurate movement clone of the P.9000 with the balance wheel @7. It is not a mod of the A7750, because the A7750 has the balance wheel @11.Functions
Hours, Minutes, Small Seconds, Date, GMT, Power Reserve Indicator on the back, Seconds Reset
Ah right, thankyou.
Both the Ceramic version with the 9001 and the Bronzo with the 9000 looked very nice it has to be said. There do seem to be some differences though, with some saying that they have a new movement, calling it a P9001, with others saying that they have just slightly changed a 7750.
The p9000 and p9001 are clones of the gen, I don't thibk they are based off the 7750. Totally different movements.
Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
It may be that the dealers are using different ways of describing the same thing, which would make sense, from a marketing perspective.
So I take it that the 9000 and the 9001, even if they are only made to look like the gen and nothing else, are looked upon favourably? Is it a decent movement in and of itself?
Well I`m possibly looking at the Bronzo, which has the movement, I may have to one of the guinea pigs and find out.Can't say as of this point. The movement is relatively new to repdom so reliability can't be established just yet.
You are correct on the functions. I meant on the look. Vsf pretty much copied the p9000 and p9001 with the same layout (mostly) and correct balance wheel. Sure function wise is not the same, but it looks like the did copy almost everything elseTechnically they aren't clones of the gen, as they do not have the functions of the gen movement (and the power reserve display onthe P.9001 is faux).