- 5/6/08
- 7,350
- 172
- 63
386 386 386 386, cmon guys chan with me and make it materialize
Yeah!!! Where is the baby?????
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
New pam for en of august
- Thread starter PANERA
- Start date
Yeah!!! Where is the baby?????
386 is so damn sexy.
But I worry how accurately they can produce it without the Gen to compare it too.
But I worry how accurately they can produce it without the Gen to compare it too.
Every time I click on this link I'm severely disappointed. I say put the watch out or don't. Teasing with no climax is just foul play!
Well the thing is not just the COMPSOITE to make a good rep of the 386....
It's also important to rep the movement better than the 359, 312
It's also important to rep the movement better than the 359, 312
I'm having a hard time believing the movement on this one will be more accurate. After all where would they found a different movement...?
I personally feel that though the accuracy of the mvt on a clear caseback offcourse is important, I still wear these reps to enjoy 'em on my wrist. I could still easily do that if the mvt is wrong.
-don't get me wrong, I would like to see a better mvt, but if the watch alone looks accurate, I'd hit it!
-don't get me wrong, I would like to see a better mvt, but if the watch alone looks accurate, I'd hit it!
The movement will not accurate cause of un able to rep....
The case the dial the CG Acd Crown are replicable not the movement
Thx
The case the dial the CG Acd Crown are replicable not the movement
Thx
Gotta agree with "the other Dane" here. Though the reps. of the other P.9000 Pams pretty much are a deal breaker for me, I'd get a 386 even with the current movements (if the rest is done properly, that is), just because the watch itself is so incredible nice.
Regards,
no name
Regards,
no name