On certain watches they actully look pretty good thoI'll make myself unpopular to 80% of the scene and call these crown guards
![]()
Enough metall in that to manufacture a tank
There are many people that like it. And apparently Rolex (I'm assuming that's who you are talking about) still sells enough units with the cyclops on it to keep it there. There are some people that actually look for this as a feature in their watch. There are also those who retro their date window with a cyclops so they can see it. You apparently are still an adolescent with perfect eyes as some with degrading eyesight desire to see the date with out any assistance (lasik, glasses, etc).
So your myopic theory, opinion, belief, whatever... is shot to hell. You may not like it but many, many, others do, Get over it.
This is an OFFICIAL PRODUCT PICTURE BY BREITLING!!!!
LOOK AT THE FUCKING TOLERANCES ON THE ENDLINKS!!!!!!!!
WORSE THAN AN ALI EXPRESS REP!!!
For 4000€!!!!
![]()
Yeah but your WRONG. No one. Nobody ever walked in to any boutique and said '"could you put a cyclops on my watch so I can see the date better" .. no one ever.
Go on show me an AP Royal Oak with a Cyclops glued on ... or I know a Patek Calatrava. It's such a brilliant, useful. attractive feature ... someone most have said "cyclops is brilliant ... I just had to add it to my watch".
If I could only have one sub, I would pick a no date to get rid of the cyclops. However, if I could have two I would get the other one with date and cyclops, just for the variety. I don't prefer it, but I still like it.
![]()
Point being you picked the no date. Because it is a better design, the original design. Rolex fan boyz where the big R foes no wrong ... want to impress me and put some effort in and be that illustrious brand ... embed the magnification into the crystal . I know too hard for Rolex ..
What?! Are you insane?! Lugs 4 life bro!Jesus H. guys, it's a frigging cyclops. He doesn't like it, he does, most simply don't mind. I would have thought the "no lugs" affirmation would have spawn much more controversy, because watches with no lugs, well, look like shit![]()
I'm sorry to disagree, but at this point, it's the watches that are useless.Moon phases. Seriously? Moon phases!?? Stupidest thing I've ever seen. If you really need to know what phase the moon is in, wait until dark and look up. Heck, sometimes the moon is even out during the day.
I'm sorry to disagree, but at this point, it's the watches that are useless.
Time is everywhere today, phone, computer, tv..
And an automatic too?
Navitimer ?
I think Charles Lindberg would have liked to have one. Obviously, today, it is much less useful.
Oh, I completely agree with thatAside from that, the watch is the only jewellery that you are allowed to wear as a man.