100% agree with
legend that this is a detail that you have to get uncomfortably close to notice. So is the faded "SWISS MADE" On previous versions of JF. They made sharper text at the cost of wrong font and wrong dial construction. And hence my comment of "1 step forward 2 steps back".
Therefore in my opinion it was better the way it was and I feel like as the other member said JF cheated to achive the Sharper Text. And I felt the same when OMF first did it to achive the "sharper text".
This is maybe my fault. But I personally hold JF at a higher standard than this, because they have done an incredible job of repping the 15400. Far better than any other 15400 till date and for them to follow on the foot steps of a competitor and cut corners was not expected and in my opinion should not be recognized as an "achievement".
Also, it's unbecoming, specialy of a TD to comment (with their email address) that their "Gen is the same, in terms of printing". Insinuating that the printing is closer to Gen, when it's not. I think is very misleading on thier part.
You are 100% correct here M.
I do not understand the fuss about the dial printing "becoming better" when in actual fact, it is exchanging one flaw for another (or exchanging 1 for 2 others like you mentioned).
Before anyone rushes to compliment the updated V5 dial, take a careful look and see for yourself the differences. The print clarity per se is better. That is indisputable. But is it more accurate and "gen-like" and something to shout about? No it isn't. The font of the "SWISS MADE" is clearly wrong, and being printed on plates, it already changes the look of the area when scrutinized. Yes like I mentioned, we are splitting hairs here, and no this feature isn't discernible in real life. But since this is a forum for discussion of details, guys should be aware of the facts and be aware of what the gen is or isn't. The gen 100% ISN'T printed that way (for discussion sake) and dealers should be responsible enough not to imply that the V5 is a 1:1 dial just to push sales.
Lets dissect the V5 dial for the sake of correcting perceptions:
The dial tapisseries of the V5 are still wrong, especially around the edges. The rest of the printing on the dial still differs slightly from gen, the "SWISS MADE" printing is still totally wrong, and the finish of the dial still varies from gen. Do all these matter in real life on the wrist? No they mostly do not. I am certain that the V5 or even V4 or V3 can pass as gen on the wrists in the wild, but place any one of them next to a gen, and the differences become very apparent.You just cannot unsee the differences. I have nothing against reps. I enjoy the evolution that the hobby has taken, but members must not be taken in by dealer propaganda and be duped that the V5 is the better and ultimate dial. Far from it. It is like comparing the tastiest apple in the world to an orange. Nobody is denying that the apple is tasty, but it can never be an orange.
So it will make more sense for the V5 to be compared with the V4 instead of the gen. There is a lot more in common there and it is meaningful to observe and debate improvements of one over the other. Whatever batch of gen dial you can find, none of the "SWISS MADE" are plate printed. And yes, I have personally seen gen printing with missing lines in the "swiss made" wording too. Gens can be imperfect too so no need to place them on pedestals. What I am saying is that the gen and rep dials are just different and we should learn to discern the differences for ourselves and not blindly be taken in by marketing talk, comparisons to online pics or by purely listening to the opinions of others, mine included. The fact is, there is no way that the V5 dial printing is gen-like. We are talking about two little, barely readable words (in real life) here, but this will apply to every feature or nuance of any rep. Dealers like to use arbitrary marketing terms like "1:1", "like the genuine", "best clone" etc and most of them are just frivolous hogwash, though there are 1 or 2 instances which I do agree with the makers. For example, I do find the JF ROO crystals 1:1 to gen or very very close. I think that JF AP case finishes in general are 1:1 to gen or very close too.
To date, there is NO 1:1 rep. Especially for APs. What you get are nice watches on the wrist. To hell with accuracy, just enjoy it for what it is without pretense or false expectations. Imperfections exist in both the gens and reps, and I firmly believe that the main difference guy who wears the gens and one who wears the rep is not the sizes of their bank accounts, but simply their level of expectations of what goes on their wrist, and what they can/cannot live with. If someone can live with all the flaws of a miyota powered V5 15400, he is not going to care if the world dissects his watch and points out that he is wearing a rep. But it is important to know the flaws or tells of the rep watch you are wearing, so that you do not get caught in awkward situations, for your own sake. Screw the world, it is your watch and you wear it any damn way you wish. But at least know the differences or tells and stop calling a non gen-like feature "gen like" out of ignorance or blindness to truth. Nobody will look down on your personal choice of watches whatever it may be. But a lack of discernment or knowledge is another thing altogether, when ample opportunities exist here for all of us to learn.