GMF Explorer II 226570 with VR3285 Made with Gen as Reference

[Winni]

just hoping to get a perfect parallel aligned magnifiying glass...

 

[micablue]

For the guys who got this new GMF Explorer II, can you confirm if the hour markers' color is correct as per gen or still greyish?

 

[TheDan772]

Just got my black dial GMF Explorer II QCs from Li. Hour markers are a very nice white - not grey.

 

[TheDan772]

 

[Winni]

I got no luck with my first one... Bad Lume on the marker at 12 and also magnifying glass looks very weird and somehow crooked.. So i passed this one; waiting for new one by Sead

 

[TheDan772]

I got no luck with my first one... Bad Lume on the marker at 12 and also magnifying glass looks very weird and somehow crooked.. So i passed this one; waiting for new one by Sead

Looks like a JVS.

 

[Winni]

are you sure? Why do you think so?

 

[TheDan772]

are you sure? Why do you think so?

Because the date wheel position on the dial is wrong - too close to the dial center.

 

[TheDan772]

Hasn't your TD told you which factory made it (if you didn't order a specific factory model)?

 

[g00n]

I got no luck with my first one... Bad Lume on the marker at 12 and also magnifying glass looks very weird and somehow crooked.. So i passed this one; waiting for new one by Sead

Is that the new Reddit QC tool 2.0? You do realise that you will never get a picture of the watch sitting at a perfect straight angle, those lines are useless…..

 

[Winni]

I specifically ordered "Explorer II 226570 904L GMF VR3285 CHS"

 

[TheDan772]

Certainly looks like a JVS factory model.

 

[TheDan772]

Who's your TD?

 

[Winni]

Sead

 

[TheDan772]

Sead

I’d ask him / them.

 

[micablue]

What about this one, does the date window looks right as a GMF?


https://clickpix.org/image/HDtaGS

 

[Feefo]

GMF Explorer II 226570 with VR3285 Made with Gen as Reference

Hi guys, I've read couple of time that thread but I'm still a bit confused about GMF vs JVS. According to trusty, at least Today, both of them have VR3285 movement. Because of that, I did not understand how the JVS might have a wrong date's position. Looking at TD's pics, what looks like a...

forum.replica-watch.info

 

[CTbeforeLP]

I specifically ordered "Explorer II 226570 904L GMF VR3285 CHS"

It's a GMF. Not JVS.

Look at the winding crown. It's a fat crown, only the new GMF have those. The date window position is correct too.

The JVS have the correct winding crown thickness. It's a good way to differentiate them if you can't recognize the date window position correctly.

Don't worry, you got a GMF. And it looks great tbh. Small things like the lume is not noticeable on your wrist.

 

[Winni]

It's a GMF. Not JVS.

Look at the winding crown. It's a fat crown, only the new GMF have those. The date window position is correct too.

The JVS have the correct winding crown thickness. It's a good way to differentiate them if you can't recognize the date window position correctly.

Don't worry, you got a GMF. And it looks great tbh. Small things like the lume is not noticeable on your wrist.

Thanks so much! Got me confused there for a sec and almost lost trust in my man sead

 

[TheDan772]

It's a GMF. Not JVS.

Look at the winding crown. It's a fat crown, only the new GMF have those. The date window position is correct too.

The JVS have the correct winding crown thickness. It's a good way to differentiate them if you can't recognize the date window position correctly.

Don't worry, you got a GMF. And it looks great tbh. Small things like the lume is not noticeable on your wrist.

I’m not so sure. I think
It’s a JVS from the date window placement on the dial. Here’s my GMF (QC pic):

Thanks so much! Got me confused there for a sec and almost lost trust in my man sead

I’m not so sure. Here’s my GMF (QC pic) for comparison.

IMG 6614

Image IMG 6614 hosted in ClickPix.org

clickpix.org