- 27/5/22
- 3,408
- 4,573
- 113
Service every year? Based on what? Seems excessive.
I think it’s out of ignorance not malice. Most “reps” are shitter tier bought on the beach in Thailand Rawleks. Most watchmakers just don’t want to deal with fixing something that cost less than $20 to make.I don't understand why there aren't more watchsmiths servicing reps. It's aggravating and it makes no sense. My watchsmith told me the reason is because parts are hard to get. I mean come'on. The movement requires the same parts as a Rolex movement and they service Rolexes with problem.
The deal with any modern Rolex / 32XX is the owner has to send it back to RSC. There maybe some parts availability, but Rolex is shutting that party down.They service Rolexes with no problem. Sorry.
The deal with any modern Rolex / 32XX is the owner has to send it back to RSC. There maybe some parts availability, but Rolex is shutting that party down.
Reps / fakes are frowned upon in most circles - and so to is making any business association with them. That isn’t going to change anytime soon.
This example doesn’t have the correct bezel with a nice thick lipone step back it seemsHere is a video for CF V2
No one has yet to have a physical copy of either the new CF or the new C+, so nothing conclusive will emerge for the upcoming three weeks or so.So what’s the conclusion after all of these? C+ or Newest CF ? I owned Y2L3 Pepsi with Xings insert. Plan to get C+ whole watch and CF V2 insert.
A proper comparison between the new BLROs from Clean and C+ is something we're all anticipating.No one has yet to have a physical copy of either the new CF or the new C+, so nothing conclusive will emerge for the upcoming three weeks or so.
But my taste is superior!!You can’t compare the two. It’s mostly a matter of taste.