- 25/9/22
- 6,007
- 16,339
- 113
Looks great ! How do you like the watch on your wrist? You had concerns being bjg.Quick and dirty first impressions
From a QC aspect, I see a few things that weren't that noticeable (this is me nit picking)
The pip is centered to the right
The top left SEL is uneven
Bezel is not aligned perfectly
From a review perspective :
New VR3235 is smooth and has no issues. Crisp winding and date setting. Crown action good.
Bracelet glidelock is smooth, no issues, diver extension's also works easily
Bezel has a small amount of backplay (as with most Clean, inferior to VSF), probably can be resolved w new click springs or something.
Pretty overblown. It doesn't wear any bigger or larger than the PAM111 or IWC3777, in fact it wears smaller than both. The caseback is high but if you wear the watch a bit tight then it's only a little thicker than the sub. The aggressively thicker bezel makes it look smaller than it actually does.Looks great ! How do you like the watch on your wrist? You had concerns being bjg.
Its only been a day but I'm considering selling my 126610 because I prefer the Seadweller. The weight and aesthetics is more true tool watch.How does your wrist feel after wearing that baby all day with the extra weight because mine feels so much different from either of my VSF 124 and 126 Subs all day. Going from the 41mm to the 43mm didn't make much of a difference but the thicker case took a little bit to get used to.
Your new baby looks good and wear it in good health my friend
Great! Enjoy it.Pretty overblown. It doesn't wear any bigger or larger than the PAM111 or IWC3777, in fact it wears smaller than both. The caseback is high but if you wear the watch a bit tight then it's only a little thicker than the sub. The aggressively thicker bezel makes it look smaller than it actually does.
Thanks for the post! It looks so much better than the first batch VSF. Correct crystal magnification, the SELs look good from front, and even the bezel insert looks better, maybe the lighting or some serious improvements after Clean release. I love the see the competition between VSF and Clean, maybe leading to a decent SD43 rep. After looking at this pic, looks like VSF is winning right now.
It's just the picture. There is no "graininess" in the dial. It's matte and smooth. It's the crystal bending light creating that effect.Frankly, I find the dial too grainy - compare this with my photo at the end of page 1 of this thread or the beginning of page 2, where a user has photographed his gen Seadweller in the sun. The dial is smooth.
I agree with you about the crystal - I have a few Clean models, but the crystals are all quite poor.
Yup. I just louped my bezel to make sure it has that depth and it sure does. Clean's inserts are always top tier.I have been criticizing the VSF and Clean bezel inserts on my previous posts and I have been told that Clean and VSF uses the same bezel insert. And I can see the weakness in the VSF bezel insert and also in the first pics of the Clean. But I thought this has changed when I saw the recents pics of watches, I see that both clean and VSF is using a much better insert. I don't know if it is OK to call this V2 but definitely a different insert. I got my hands on a Clean insert here from a member and I think it is pretty good. Here are a couple pics of the original VSF insert and the latest Clean insert for your reference. First batch is tagged VSF and the latest is tagged CF.