Yes, at least a warranty of 6 months could exist. Some TD like Trustytime make it.Haha..that's fair..I didn't read that part...too bad I haven't gotten my refund..lol..this thread should still serve as a warning of how to set expectations...
Lots of abuse to a member with a legitimate claim. Last several threads i read where someone posted bad rep about a TD (not just this one) immediately bunch of people come in saying "omg this is not amazon what do you expect" and start bashing him without even looking at the claim.
Things are pretty clear, he was offered refund (for whatever reason), refund did not come and he was ghosted until he opened this thread. Only then he got a refund.
This forum is a great resource, but for some reasons some members are overly protective of any negative feedback about a TD. There's a reason this exists and someone is a TD. There's nothing shady going on. Being ghosted after refund is shady. If you stop allowing any negative feedback on TDs (and responses from members in this thread are way towards that), they will stop self regulating and here and there, won't send a refund. 1-2 will turn into 10-20, until it hits one of the members that is deemed "respectable" on the forum and then it will be "omg he was good now hes bad". Yes, im a new member, but i've spent reading shitton on the forum last couple weeks without a single post as there's nothing to contribute. Just glad admins have enough sense to keep these threads up.
This is exactly what happened. There was absolutely NOTHING wrong with that watch. There was certainly no evidence that it was "rubbed against a brick wall, it had scratches on the bezel, the crown was damaged as if it was turned with a vice-grip..." It's insulting that OP thinks we are stupid enough to believe his bullshit. He had buyer's remorse and instead of doing the honorable thing by completing the transaction as he promised, he fabricated reasons to reject the watch. He could have just sold it on RWI for a slight loss. OP is as sorry as they come.The problem is that OP inflated some (at most) mild issues because OP was afraid he would not have gotten affirmation from the forum otherwise. When you read the story and then see the QC pics, it's comical.
What actually happend is, OP had a bad feeling about the watch, wanted a refund and did not get it and then opened fire on the vendor instead of staying calm. This is textbook Karen behaviour.
I agree regarding the communication IF that’s what actually happened. It doesn’t make any difference the type of business, you need to communicate with your customers. If a refund was promised a refund should be issued in a timely fashion.That is okay, he did exaggerate. But that was besides the point, he was offered refund and was ghosted, that is not okay. I mean seller can even reply "okay give me 1 week, 2 weeks etc", just so you know what's going on. If seller refused refund because of bad claims, that's for debate, but seller agreed to refund.
While on that, i don't see any reason to not refund someone immediately, these are not professional sellers that keep books so there's some accounting going on for a refund etc. If i send a wise/paypal payment, why cant that be returned swiftly? They're non-reversable.
In any case, these are not cheap replicas, it's 1:1 a lot of the times, very good quality in a lot of these watches (obviously all have differences from gen) but in general, i don't see a problem with him wanting a mint watch no scratches. I could live with his watch, but i understand some people can't. I mean these scratches would appear after 1 week of wearing it anyway but those are all besides the point i would say. It's important to have all these so TD's can self regulate.
For example, for me, showing me these scratches would never put me off from buying from this seller. Ghosting on a promised refund however, is disturbing. So if you imagine things transpired a bit differently, where OP complained about a watch he received with said QC pictures and was refused a refund, i would not take his side likely.
Huh? I get it. You’re angry with Hont. However, if the guy gets a perfectly good watch (he gets what he paid for) a refund is not his “right.” That’s not how it works. If Hont promised a refund then the guy is entitled to a refund, despite making baseless and fabricated complaints about the watch.if he says he wants a refund then it is his right. watch good or not. it is his decision too. u guys bashing him is so wrong.
Whats perfect or not. Its not up to u. Because u dont pay for it.Huh? I get it. You’re angry with Hont. However, if the guy gets a perfectly good watch (he gets what he paid for) a refund is not his “right.” That’s not how it works. If Hont promised a refund then the guy is entitled to a refund, despite making baseless and fabricated complaints about the watch.
Your expectations from your comment on someone's superfranken build disqualify you from having an intelligent opinion. Be quietWhats perfect or not. Its not up to u. Because u dont pay for it.
According to u. As long as some strangers like it he has to gl the watch?? If he says refund then he should give refund. He is a trusted dealer here.
It’s an objective analysis. That watch was fine. He doesn’t have to GL anything, but if he has any integrity he should be honest and not make shit up, because he has buyer’s remorse. I may be wrong, but I’m not. I’ll cut you some slack because you are probably 15 and have been a member 3 months.Whats perfect or not. Its not up to u. Because u dont pay for it.
According to u. As long as some strangers like it he has to gl the watch?? If he says refund then he should give refund. He is a trusted dealer here.
U guys are not here to judge. If he wants a refund, he should get it. Thats what makes a trusted dealer. PeriodIt’s an objective analysis. That watch was fine. He doesn’t have to GL anything, but if he has any integrity he should be honest and not make shit up, because he has buyer’s remorse. I may be wrong, but I’m not. I’ll cut you some slack because you are probably 15 and have been a member 3 month
Shuussshhhh!!! The adults are talkingU guys are not here to judge. If he wants a refund, he should get it. Thats what makes a trusted dealer. Period
So if I buy a watch and receive perfectly good QC pictures you think I should have the right to reject the watch and receive a refund just because I changed my mind?U guys are not here to judge. If he wants a refund, he should get it. Thats what makes a trusted dealer.