- 18/12/15
- 9,897
- 13,759
- 113
This is a step down!Thx, I'm looking for a better bracelet for my BP 16613
This is a step down!Thx, I'm looking for a better bracelet for my BP 16613
As a daily the ln is the way to go. I have a modded RAF lv but the BP ln gets a lot more wrist time. As for the 300 m 300m issue, it's a 15-30 year old model, nobody has a clue other than us here. It's a none issue for me at least. It looks and feels great as is.This is the first time I've read an entire thread, it has been VERY informative, so thank you all!
However, no one mentioned the 300 m issue that I see on all the dials. I have only compared it to gen LN and LV and they have all the writings as 300m WITHOUT the spacing between the letter and number. My comparison has been with gen LN and LV from the years 2007-2008, but I've also been looking at older model years. Maybe it is a known thing whit the BP, hence it isn't mentioned in this thread?
On another note, I have been debating with my self whether to get the LN or LV, my heart says LV but I will not be able to change the hands myself. The LN would be a straight wear and enjoy for me, I've not (yet) modded or worked on watches before, only replaced the battery on a quartz watch beforefurthermore the LV might be too "flashy" and attract unnecessary attention as I plan on using it as a daily. Please feel free to give input
![]()
It's not an issue because it's there are gen iterations of the 11610 (as well as the 116610) with the m removed. Such as this one:This is the first time I've read an entire thread, it has been VERY informative, so thank you all!
However, no one mentioned the 300 m issue that I see on all the dials. I have only compared it to gen LN and LV and they have all the writings as 300m WITHOUT the spacing between the letter and number. My comparison has been with gen LN and LV from the years 2007-2008, but I've also been looking at older model years. Maybe it is a known thing whit the BP, hence it isn't mentioned in this thread?
On another note, I have been debating with my self whether to get the LN or LV, my heart says LV but I will not be able to change the hands myself. The LN would be a straight wear and enjoy for me, I've not (yet) modded or worked on watches before, only replaced the battery on a quartz watch beforefurthermore the LV might be too "flashy" and attract unnecessary attention as I plan on using it as a daily. Please feel free to give input
![]()
I know his bracelets but was not aware of a steel/Gold one ?Try Italian Bracelet and wait for next opening window
Send a PM to @markiemark
I know his bracelets but was not aware of a steel/Gold one ?
Appreciate the feedback! im also thinking LN would be a great daily, I think ill just order one after CNY.As a daily the ln is the way to go. I have a modded RAF lv but the BP ln gets a lot more wrist time. As for the 300 m 300m issue, it's a 15-30 year old model, nobody has a clue other than us here. It's a none issue for me at least. It looks and feels great as is.
Wso is expensive but makes decent gd wrapped Bracelets. Problem is, it is the incorrect end links
Do you have a link to WSO broWso is expensive but makes decent gd wrapped Bracelets. Problem is, it is the incorrect end links
On my eyes the sd wears smaller when a look at the wrist
I also wear more the sd vs 16610 as it look more balanced to me
LE
That been said I switch just now from SD to Sub
![]()
![]()
I think the SD may seem smaller due ton cyclops and the crystal being larger and not making the view of the dial be as “open”.
But that’s the joy of life. We see things differently and share experiences.
Does the BP 16610 have the divers extension?
Sounds good, I guess it is likely the 16610 has it too. And thanks for replying!My 16613 does
YesDoes the BP 16610 have the divers extension?