SuperLory
Well-Known Repist
- 22/10/15
- 8,455
- 5,046
- 113
I ordered one from Puretime and received disappointing QC shots. I rejected the watch. Main reason being the poor pearl finish. Few other niggles too. The marker at 12 is slightly offset and there’s a tiny hole in the lume on the hour hand too. The tube height is a little high. Anal to some maybe, but there are better ones out there. See the comparison below.
QC shot I received:
Here’s a QC shot of a good one for reference. Not mine unfortunately:
Originally posted by jackflash View Post
I ordered one from Puretime and received disappointing QC shots. I rejected the watch. Main reason being the poor pearl finish. Few other niggles too. The marker at 12 is slightly offset and there’s a tiny hole in the lume on the hour hand too. The tube height is a little high. Anal to some maybe, but there are better ones out there. See the comparison below.
QC shot I received:
Here’s a QC shot of a good one for reference. Not mine unfortunately:
I can also see a clear difference in the crown tube lenght, don’t think you are being anal at all ...
I think you're mistaken, there's less than 1mm clearance between the bezel and the crown as it stands. Considdering mine was the one labeled above QC1 puretime it's a pretty big difference. Brings it down at least to QC2. perhaps it's the angles of the photos. I'll see if i can dig out my caliper and find an actual measurement online too. Either way we're talking about <0.5mm at this point.
+1. We need to see multiple angles of these "new" ones that supposedly have a shorter tube length. The hands on the other hand do seem to be changed. Unless the lighting conditions or camera settings were different from picture to picture.hmmm, honestly youre probably right. do you have a picture from the back? a caseback-side shot would make it pretty easy to compare the tube length.
+1. We need to see multiple angles of these "new" ones that supposedly have a shorter tube length. The hands on the other hand do seem to be changed. Unless the lighting conditions or camera settings were different from picture to picture.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I've had my ZF 58 since the end of Jan, and I can say the I'm very happy with it. Its fast become my everyday watch. Multiple times I've gone and compared it to a Gen in the stores and neither I/the salesperson can tell the different.
Buddy, stop wearing reps in gen stores. And if you do, I wouldn't brag about it here.I've had my ZF 58 since the end of Jan, and I can say the I'm very happy with it. Its fast become my everyday watch. Multiple times I've gone and compared it to a Gen in the stores and neither I/the salesperson can tell the different.
Long time Lurker, First-time poster.
Need Help with QC of the BB58 Here. Got it from Puretime.
The flaw I noticed:
1. The Lume is of a different color.
Can't spot anything else, to be honest. But, then again, I have an untrained eye for this.
Any help would be appreciated.
More pictures can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/80VbZck
They allowed me 24 hours to get a QC of this, I have asked them to send me the pictures again because some of them are grainy and hazy!