• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

ARF 16610LV Kermit 904L

lamkinpark

Known Member
12/10/18
126
33
28
Yes, LN dial is wrong.
996946c488b4679ca2a5b4e0f060f147.jpg
1d6622fc12eec64fb677244a1fb0edbb.jpg
b8c111b82ba9446e0fd257f5f6d1ff5c.jpg


Sent from my CLT-L29 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColumnWheel

houss1981

Active Member
15/3/17
221
53
28
Bro it means this dial layout and font does not exist on a rolex 16610 that is authentic .arf just try to copy the latest 116610ln dial and added non maxi markers

Ok thank you. What about case, lugs, bracelet and buckle? A member here said that even numbers on bracelet does not match the ones on the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColumnWheel

heska

Renowned Member
Supporter
29/11/17
687
378
63
buckle? A member here said that even numbers on bracelet does not match the ones on the case.

Clasp Date code (CL10) doesn't match the code inside the SEL (EO). Model code is also wrong (93253 instead of 93250).

Note it still seems a bit better :
-Codes aren't stamped anymore, but laser engraved.
- Lock buckle also seems better finished and its rivet no longer seems aligned with the holes for divers extention pin (it's not on gen but was on JF)

But crown on clasp is still not great
 
Last edited:

houss1981

Active Member
15/3/17
221
53
28
Clasp Date code (CL10) doesn't match the code inside the SEL (EO). Model code is also wrong (93253 instead of 93250).

Note it still seems a bit better :
-Codes aren't stamped anymore, but laser engraved.
- Lock buckle also seems better finished and its rivet doesn't seems aligned anymore with the holes for divers extention pin

But crown on clasp is still not great

Very informative. Thank you
We just have to wait then for the V2 or 3 or 4 or even never.....
 

Shany

Active Member
24/6/19
262
77
28
LV looks great imo... for franken the LN is cool aswell.
 

Btadl1997

Active Member
MULTI ACCOUNT
12/2/18
202
182
43
I canceled my order after seeing the terrible printing on the dial. Especially the “O” in Rolex on the LV.


Sent from my iPhone using RWI
 

lamkinpark

Known Member
12/10/18
126
33
28
I canceled my order after seeing the terrible printing on the dial. Especially the “O” in Rolex on the LV.


Sent from my iPhone using RWI
There are 2 type of 'O' in LV generation of dials. This dial is quite close to mk4 dial.

Sent from my CLT-L29 using Tapatalk
 

Sdc83

Renowned Member
20/1/13
580
172
43
this arf has taken many steps back from the Jf. Dw font is even fatter, unwatchable, cg would seem too short, the crown too thin, the pearl of the insert looks like a cheap replica, but I think the most depressing thing is the movement: still that crap of SH!
This time ARF did everything wrong. And that Dw is an insult to everyone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColumnWheel

mclarendude

Legendary Member
Staff member
Moderator Sales
Certified
16/2/11
29,037
34,158
113
ATL
To the untrained eye, it looks so crisp and good... but then...
 

Makoto

Getting To Know The Place
29/2/20
74
8
8
Any rumors of other factories remaking it? This needs much improvement beyond replacing the DW.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

DC109

Renowned Member
21/7/12
609
210
43
Apologies if someone said this already, but I didn't see it--the rehaut is also incorrect compared to gen. Similar to the JF, the "wall" is too vertical and not quite long enough, and the top is too wide/thick. Amazing that after all these years, still only TC has gotten that detail right.