ukbondraider
Active Member
- 20/9/14
- 350
- 0
- 0
I find it odd that people seek 100% replication then are happy to install straps with wonky stitching which far away would immediately scream rep.
Excellent news donsi, looking forward to a wristy from you.
Replication should be as close to 100% as possible, otherwise it is not replication. Reps that have alot of faults can be good functioning and looking watches, but they will always be bad replicas. I would rather buy a good gen watch rather than a faulty replica. Why? I think many would say it has to do with recognition.
What I want to know is why the anal folk care so much about 100% replication. This Schumi is a brilliant rep in its own right.
Unless you are Tom Cruise or David Beckham you aren't going to get away with people thinking you own a gen Schumi even if you are an unknown billionaire. Just enjoy the rep for what it is.
Even if they do fix the tachy, dial colour and date print, you are always going to have the date position (which they will likely never be able to fix) as an immediate tell for those in the know i. e less than 1% of the population. The rest will naturally assume it is a rep even if you did have a gen if they know the price of the watch. The others not in the know will think it is a normal USD 100 non special watch.
This argument is void to me because my anal-ness is all for the sake of satisfying myself, not satisfying other people or worrying others might call me out.
I'm not wearing a watch for the sake of others.
*Sent from my fingers using my head*
This argument is void to me because my anal-ness is all for the sake of satisfying myself, not satisfying other people or worrying others might call me out.
I'm not wearing a watch for the sake of others.
*Sent from my fingers using my head*
My last post on this Kindergarten , if you do not have a good relationship to your TD, why do you say you have been involved in the development? Saying this in the public economy, youn would have been fired.
This argument is void to me because my anal-ness is all for the sake of satisfying myself, not satisfying other people or worrying others might call me out.
I'm not wearing a watch for the sake of others.
*Sent from my fingers using my head*
ukbondraider;2028999 Therefore the flaws shouldnt matter if the rep is a good rep. This Schumi is an excellent rep....[/QUOTE said:If the rep has flaws, it is not a good rep for many of us. Look at it as a case of "derived" demand: higher prices make people demand "better" products.
If the rep has flaws, it is not a good rep for many of us. Look at it as a case of "derived" demand: higher prices make people demand "better" products.
[video]http://vid1178.photobucket.com/albums/x369/zorrolondon/My%20first%20movie_20141119_192420_zps36xwxjhm.mp4[/video]
quick video
I'm sure most people in general especially those have received the Schumi already know it's a very decent piece BUT I think why most people are so anal about the flaws is bcoz they are flaws that could have been avoided if J12 paid more attention to detail. Lets be honest the dial is a very important part of any watch that's one of the thing in full view , it's the part that reflects a certain glare to the watch and we have already been through the whole wrong dial problems with previous releases which were updated in the BB, Panda, the 44mm's and a few other releases so when a long awaited release comes out and a problem such as the dial which can be fixed, it could be dissappointing . We all already aware of the open case back which shows our not so good looking movement but I'm sure that's a flaw everyone is willing to live with till the movement is replicated but a wrong dial could have been avoided, that's why people are so anal... They've got it right before in previous releases so why the Schumi, that the reason people seem to be complaining , there should be some progression ...... Besides they had the Gen in hand to compare ....... Just my opinion, it's a very good rep BUT could have been better......If the rep has flaws, it is not a good rep for many of us. Look at it as a case of "derived" demand: higher prices make people demand "better" products.
RB2 has his tells too, but there is still very high demand for it and when they pop in they sold in a minutes. IMO the schumi will be appreciated when it goes sold out.
Is there any of you "managed" to scratch the cermet bezel up to the moment? My Safari ROO bezel got scratched within two days I wore it. Now my Schumi bezel is still like new after few days of care-free wear. Amazing!
If I can choose, this cermet material should be treated as an optional upgrade to all other stainless steel ROO. Its color is like steel anyway but the watch can remain its new look for a much longer time.
The open caseback is already an enormous tell so if the dial color is a bit off or not i don't think is so big drama, plus it changes with the light so sometimes it will be darker sometimes lighter. For it's 700$ it could be better but at the end of the day it's still replica so or you live with it or just don't buy it.
About v2 i heard they won't do, but who knows,
RB.