Counterpoint!
First: "better than gen," I'll disagree. I've never seen a rep that looks "better" than the watch upon which it is based, but I digress.
In defense of OP, I made a similar post about gens a while ago without taking this absurd amount of heat. I feel like I am at a Star Wars convention and mispronounced "Dagobah."
I know it is "the Cardinal rule" but the ADs are not God-like. They are mall retail workers who wear suits (when few professionals even wear suits these days).
The average person on this forum knows FAR more about watches than the average AD guy/gal behind the counter (who care little about whether your watch is a rep or gen, as long as you look like a sucker).
I have owned maybe 30 gen Rolex, Breitling, whatever and have had many discussions with ADs at Mayors, etc. The consensus is, most of the people who come in the store are wearing reps, some who don't even know. I think most of the people on here must have never been to an AD. All these stories about snooty ADs calling people out on reps, I don't buy it.
I remember one sales rep saying they size bracelets for reps all day long, and often the guy in the back will put in better spring bars, all for free. This is a service based industry. They can't afford to antagonize some CEO who is too vapid to realize he bought a fake Daytona, so they just smile and get on with their lives. Asking an AD to fix your rep, on the other hand? LOL, have fun reading that letter from RSC.
Anyway, back on topic, yes, I had a gen SA and also had a rep SA with gen dial. That is the last $$$$ gen I will ever buy. I could not tell the difference between the two watches. An Asian 7750 is junk IMO compared to an ETA, but otherwise, if I wasn't aware of the miniscule differences, I would not be able to tell one from the other. Even The movement sounded the same.
That is when I swore off gens except for certain pieces, say a vintage Speedy Pro or a well priced 7750, like Marathon CSAR. You can buy a new 7750 for the price Breitling charges to throw some oil on theirs ("exaggeration," gentlemen). There are no precious metals on an SA. I like the designs but I swear my 90s Chronomats, they felt and looked special. The new breed, they just feel and look cheap. If Breitling cannot make a watch that looks/feels better than a rep for ten times the amount, sorry... I am one less sucker.
And the market isn't stupid, either. I sold my mint SA for $2,950, a huge loss after a few months, and I honestly felt sorry for the person paying that much for it, since it will probably be $1,950 in a year or so- about the price it should probably have cost new! ::grumble grumble where's my coffee::
The rampant judgmental behavior of people brought together for their mutual adoration of counterfeit products sometimes astounds me. Klonopin, gentlemen. Klonopin.
Edit: and if we are talking about "good behavior," Rolex et al. spend hundreds of millions to make insecure people feel like they aren't special or successful if they don't have a precious TT Sub. It is such BS. The vast majority of people who wear $4,000+ watches cannot afford to. Even if you can "afford" to, it is likely a terrible financial decision. There was a time when quality and workmanship justified and necessitated exorbitant prices, but these days, your precious ETA assembled by a robot might as well be a Seiko (which is at least priced realistically).
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
well said!