ZZF NoDate V3 3130
Im sorry to say this. But this is in fact a v2s. Not the newest v3.
ZZF NoDate V3 3130
PIC HEAVY
I just received my ZZF NoDate V3 3130 today (delivered in a snap by excellent Sead, thank to him!).
Oh clasp code, true... That maybe why the clasp is under expected then.Im sorry to say this. But this is in fact a v2s. Not the newest v3.
Oh clasp code, true... That maybe why the clasp is under expected then.
Oh you know, I'm a simple man, if I see V3 written on a box, then V3 it is LMAO.
Thank you guys for clearing, let me note this in my post so other members are aware of the differences.
Envoyé de mon ELE-L29 en utilisant Tapatalk
What did you order though? Is this a concerning TD failure (with seeming attempts to mislead given the sticker on the coffin) or something else?
It's a good question.What did you order though? Is this a concerning TD failure (with seeming attempts to mislead given the sticker on the coffin) or something else?
It's a good question.
Sead did'nt mention the version on his listing. I asked if it was a V3 first, which I did'nt had an answer to (only a "here are QC pics") . But in my QC pics, I received a clear picture with the C4R clasp code showing.
I did'nt realise it was not the right V3 code, and opened a nice box with the V3 sticker you see on my picture, so I found myself miles away from the clasp code thing yesterday.
TD's fault, mine? If I want to be picky I'd say TD, as I never had the answer to my 1rst question in the 1rst place, leading me to blindfully trust I was buying the right version.
But in another hand, I should have realized the clasp code was not right. So who's to blame?
Right now I'm definitely happy with the watch, it all is well made (but the clasp lol) and I can't picture myself returning it (plastics all gone, I waterpfroofed it...). But some may really want to check this clasp code thing on QCs before approval...
Envoyé de mon ELE-L29 en utilisant Tapatalk
If it makes you feel any better there is no v3 with the clone movement, but the v2s is the same watch bar the clasp. Its a very good rep, version number is academic
Wait, really? Jtime is selling a VR3130 v3 on his site with clasp 1LD though.
If it makes you feel any better there is no v3 with the clone movement, but the v2s is the same watch bar the clasp. Its a very good rep, version number is academic
you are wrong guy..... V3 is present with both movements
True, and this head is very good I must say and I'm really happy with it.Well thats changed as the one listed first was only the eta clone. Fact remains the watch head hasnt changed from v2s to v3
True, and this head is very good I must say and I'm really happy with it.
Let's be clear, although not improved, the bracelet on my received non-V3 (lol) is very nice still. I'll post more detailed shots of it, so others have a clear view of the differences with the V3 ARF / CF bracelet.
All in all it' s an amazing rep, but the blur around the versions of the watch TDs are selling these days is annoying.
Envoyé de mon ELE-L29 en utilisant Tapatalk
No way it's better than ARF.
For all who don't know V2S no-date has a different clasp than other prior ZZFs so its kinda one off as all V3's comes with the new ARF one. Clasp shape in my opinion is very good and closer to gen than the V3 ARF one. Though the glidelock on mine slides really really bad but it has metal sliders unlike the prior plastic ones.
You good? It for sure is better than all arfs !