It doesn't seem to be a zzf nor noob nor arf… at all. It looks like one of those $ 100 patches. There are no alignments at all ...? that's only my opinion
What do you mean? DW, cyclops (with white halo like ZZF), rehaut, pearl, SELs, markers and logo triangle marker looks well and aligned.
Can't say to 100% it's ZZF but that DW-typopraphy and cyclops sure looks like ZZF.
Skickat från min SM-G973F via Tapatalk
I can say for sure it is ZZF, has the lower case letters in the clasp, and X flaw in rehaut. I am just trying to figure if this is definitely a v2 as it was sold to me.
hmm are you sure this is v2? looks like the insert has noticably thinner numbers. but in the review they looked very close
They made the 6 and 9 markers rounded like gen on v2 if I’m correct and this seems has sharp edges like on v1.
Also the rehaut misalignment was an issue with v1 like this has.
So looks like I have a v1.... damn so I got screwed here thinking I paid top dollar for a 3135 V2! This is what I get for buying on the forum next door
If it was bought via an M2M sale, you should still have recourse to raising it with the seller and the mods. But your first port of call should be the seller - tell him what you’ve discovered, and get into a discussion about resolving the issue.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Had quite a few asking me so I’ve done this ‘quick’ review of some clone subs vs my gen....
I hate doing things like this so please excuse the mistakes/lack of clarity and pikey camera angle. I just thought it might be interesting to some of the sub fans like me.
The zzf V2 is fantastic, it still has its flaws which I’ve listed below as I missed a few points in the video but it really could pass as gen to most.
Please bare in mind there will be some variance in both gens and clones so these are purely my findings with what I had in hand.
If you love the sub and can afford it, buy the gen it’s just exceptional.
If you can’t afford/justify it the zzf V2 is fantastic, personally I’d go gen bezel insert and call it a day if this is the case.
Tells that are clear to see in hand...
-Serial no wonky on zzf V2
-Hour markers too thin on zzf V2, completely wrong on ARF
-Bezel much stiffer on zzf V2, too lose on ARF
-Bezel insert colour and finish, gen looks brighter and the finish looks like it really ‘pops’
-Hands look flat on zzf V2, slightly better ARF
-No big bubble/dip on dial around handstack
-Pearl looks bright/glossy on gen, too flat colour wise on ARF
-Cyclops looks much clearer and crisp on gen, slightly better on ARF, a bit cloudy on ZZF V2
-Cyclops AR looks different shade on gen
-Bezel sharper and not as bright/shiny on zzf V2 , also wrong shape on both.
-Clasp feels cheap in comparison on both, zzf V2 better in my opinion batch dependant.
-Dial text looks weak and almost a ‘blue’ shade, not as bold and bright as gen
-Rehault looks much brighter and more crisp on gen
-LEC is harder to see on gen
-SEL is less pronounced on both ARF and ZZF V2.
https://youtu.be/fI8V7WYsqXQ
yes pretty sure as it has the 3135 movement and the quality is awesome for a rep.
but zzf has the CF insert and it shouldnt look dull in low light or have thin insert engravings like yours. it should be very very close to gen. which dealer was it may i ask?
but zzf has the CF insert and it shouldnt look dull in low light or have thin insert engravings like yours. it should be very very close to gen. which dealer was it may i ask?
Good god dude start a channel I could watch these all day long.
here is sunlight photo of CF insert vs gen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk