- 14/7/17
- 163
- 67
- 28
I purchased mine from InTime on the 13th November and received QC photos today (16th), so very reasonable time there. However as you said the QC images were quite poor (see photo below).
Please can get all of your opinions on this QC, specifically:
- 6 marker looks off centred?
- 9 markers looks odd?
- Are the SELs correct?
- Anything else worth pointing out?
To me it seems like the 9 marker looks weird due to the shadow of the second hand
Agree with you 100%Geese this thread is staring to look like a Sub thread, all of the nitpicking used to be reserved for Subs but now we're getting it on a Tudor.
I'm glad I'm not so choosy, much easier to enjoy my watches without worrying about all those horrible flaws and tells.
Approved my QC pics today. I swore off no more reps this year BUT this I couldn't pass up.
I am happy with my insert blue to red transition across the 3 and my DW alignment
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Approved my QC pics today. I swore off no more reps this year BUT this I couldn't pass up.
I am happy with my insert blue to red transition across the 3 and my DW alignment
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
The one and only SeadLooks great. Do you mind if I ask which td you got this from?
I got my QC photos: https://imgur.com/a/55rPfCb
I highlighted potential problem areas.
A paint spec under the T
Crooked six marker
DW looks aligned too much to the left
Is +/-18 seconds per day too high?
I am thinking that I should decline this. Do you guys agree?
First impressions are that this is a damn good rep. Sure the hand stack is not correct,