^^would love to see some pics comparing the ZF and your gen!
Fair play man i can’t fault that. I don't think I’ve ever tested a watch i didn't lube up first but i guess i’m just extra careful. Silicone lube is your friend when it comes to wr!
Re: The bracelets; loose or tight are hard qualities to understand unless you are there. Let me try. If I set each of the 3 watches on their face with the bracelets closed, the Z+F sags the most, followed by the Gen, with the JF V5 sagging the least. In other words the bracelet forms a near perfect oval with the JF and with the Gen I get maybe a 3/8ths in sag at the clasp and with the Z+F I get about a 3/4 in sag in the middle at the clasp. And frankly I can't really call any of them "rough." If I am being really nitpicky I would call the Gen a smoother wearing bracelet but the difference is so subtle I never notice. My JF is a blue dial, but both my gen and the Z+F are black dials and between the two I can see no noticeable difference from the top or sides even with a 3.5 power loupe unless of course I look at the movement. There are quite a few tells there the larges of course being the orientation of the movement. I can tell the difference between the thickness of the Gen and the JF but it is not all that great as my JF calipers out at 10.2 mm. The Z+F is a bit under 10 mm and my Gen is 9.9 mm with my calipers which unfortunately are plastic so those measurements may be relative but not accurate. I frankly am blown away by the accuracy on the dial and the hands of the Z+F. Again if I am being very nitpicky I might be forced to say the date wheel on the Z+F is a part of a tenth of a mm below the bottom of the dial where the Gen it is right up against the back of the dial. But again that takes a LED flashlight and a loupe to make that statement.
Well i got this for the mrs a few years ago. Quality aside i like the colour schemeDon't forget to tell them that you never met a pink dial you don't love too, while you are at it Dr FS. lol
Well i got this for the mrs a few years ago. Quality aside i like the colour scheme
![]()
Well I don't know which is more disturbing, the pink dial you are showing, or the recent puerile mudslinging by a well-known modder.
Its a close tie, but if you show something like that again good doctor, we are going to have to cease being friendly with each other, on account on very conflicting tastes in watches. :hehehe:
Re: The bracelets; loose or tight are hard qualities to understand unless you are there. Let me try. If I set each of the 3 watches on their face with the bracelets closed, the Z+F sags the most, followed by the Gen, with the JF V5 sagging the least. In other words the bracelet forms a near perfect oval with the JF and with the Gen I get maybe a 3/8ths in sag at the clasp and with the Z+F I get about a 3/4 in sag in the middle at the clasp. And frankly I can't really call any of them "rough." If I am being really nitpicky I would call the Gen a smoother wearing bracelet but the difference is so subtle I never notice. My JF is a blue dial, but both my gen and the Z+F are black dials and between the two I can see no noticeable difference from the top or sides even with a 3.5 power loupe unless of course I look at the movement. There are quite a few tells there the larges of course being the orientation of the movement. I can tell the difference between the thickness of the Gen and the JF but it is not all that great as my JF calipers out at 10.2 mm. The Z+F is a bit under 10 mm and my Gen is 9.9 mm with my calipers which unfortunately are plastic so those measurements may be relative but not accurate. I frankly am blown away by the accuracy on the dial and the hands of the Z+F. Again if I am being very nitpicky I might be forced to say the date wheel on the Z+F is a part of a tenth of a mm below the bottom of the dial where the Gen it is right up against the back of the dial. But again that takes a LED flashlight and a loupe to make that statement.
pkincy that's the kind of feedback i like to read with my morning coffeethanks
Really? What about the “feedback about legend” thread you started? Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just received my black dial and it is horrible quality compared to my 3 other JF Ap ROOs.
Rotor must be extremely thin/light. It makes a horrendously loud noise that oil will not fix. The rotor besides looking extremely thin/cheap also looks warped.
The bezel screws are not recessed. 2 are like half recessed others are completely flat.
Ap logo bracelet clasp is extremely loose and something on the bracelet squeaks when you move it around a bit.
The watch feels much lower quality than my other replica AP's. Honestly seems like something you would buy for $80 out of the back of a van at a flea market. (No experience there lol)
Also note I brought the clasp + movement noise to PT's attention when doing QC to make sure they dont send me something like this. Also mentioned the bezel screws not looking recessed. They said its just the angle/lighting and that they are recessed.
All in all....the manufacturer is probably throwing things together with zero quality control, on a brand new watch that they dont have any experience with, and it was replicated on the cheapest worn out gen AP 15400 they could find.
With that being said... buy at your own peril.
legend thank you for the input. I believe the rotor may also be loose as it is not just miyota loud. It is definitely a problem.
The bezel screws are not recessed. 2 are like half recessed others are completely flat.