Wow, coming from you that's a real enthusiastic endorsement for this rep!
Now that I am back at home I see the lume mismatch between dial and hands many members have referred to. I will need to correct that for sure. It is easy for me, and something that personally matters to me: The dial has an ivory lume that is quite strong, but the hands have the cheap imitation Chinese C1 lume that is white and much weaker. Easy to fix, but a little tedious and expensive. Plus, I see my bezel is not brushed vertical. Will have to redo that, and make the edges a little sharper with a sharpening stone. No problem. As for the movement: The timegraph is great at 300amp +/- 10 s/d. No servicing needed. My thickness measures at the typical 8.6mm glass to glass. I will refuse every request to make it thinner--it can, I suppose, be done, for a little more thinness (maybe .1mm) or rather (more truthfully) I do not want to do it (as I do not think it is worth it): the watch wears light and thin enough. I did not have any problem with the screws being loctited (I hate that too), and I kind of admire XF for using the same antiquated system as AP. It is fine with me. The only other thing that bugs me is the crystal. I suppose XF crystals (from their Divers on) are a matter of taste: there is AR, but it is tinted and a little weak. I am not suggesting 2AR, as I do not want to see that dial/hand combination clearer, but a Prof 1AR would be a nice upgrade. Then, of course, there are the hands: that is a big turn-off for me. Admittedly, the XF hands are better than the "flying saucer" hands of the JF 15202, but the deco plate to cover the seconds pinion is off-centered on the deco plate, and the surrounding hand is just too thick to be anything close to a gen hand set--speaking as a person who has spent thousands of dollars on gen 15202 and 5402 hand-sets over the last year, for better or worse (they are very thin around the pinion). The consumer advocate here at RWI will want to do a comparison of the JF and XF (and ZF when it is released). My JF has been laying in pieces under a dust cover since release, so I cannot do this. Will re-post when I re-assess though which is the better base for a 15202/5402 Franken: not that there are many people interested in that, maybe 1 or 2 are. As for the XF dial, hmm, the tapisserie is just circular and the print is not exact, but in this case I am not really thinking the dial is so important for some reason. Good news: the bezel screws did not really irritate me as much as I thought they would, and those who are driving their TDs insane rejecting QC photos because of defective bezel screws need to calm down. Surprise: they are not that bad in real life. (Here an endorsement for the super obsessive): Perhaps send the whole screw set to flying-tommmy for white gold plating, but overall they are a lot better than your QC photos would suggest. But,then, I got one of the first examples from XF, and maybe it is an exception. Still, had to wait a long time for it to arrive. Hope all this feedback helps. Not much more for me to say.