Why are TD dealing reps have wrong hand stacks? All GMT reps have the wrong order and it's an obvious issue.. Is there a specific reason for this? Please forgive me ignorance.
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Wrong hand stacks
- Thread starter TitleistRolex
- Start date
Specific reason = reliability; correct handstack is an adapted modification, it will start to slip and stop working;
It is the least bothering and the least important flaw of them all because on the wrist You can´t see it (unless twice a day for some minutes).
When the lume is 1mm bad applied or a marker is 1mm off You can see it with the naked eye - and that bothers.
Now it´s there
Now it´s gone
It is the least bothering and the least important flaw of them all because on the wrist You can´t see it (unless twice a day for some minutes).
When the lume is 1mm bad applied or a marker is 1mm off You can see it with the naked eye - and that bothers.
Now it´s there
Now it´s gone
- 3/6/14
- 14,674
- 6,128
- 113
The ignorance of some people on here drives me absolutely nuts.
What makes you say that an ICHS is an unspottable flaw for anyone?
How can you generalize that? I dare anyone, shoot me pics of GMT's, Explorers, whatever model it is, I spot every CHS and ICHS.. Give me a good glimpse of an eye for 2 seconds on your wrist when sitting next to me I can also spot your ICHS. Please stop with that utter bullshit.
Same goes for people saying SEL fit on ceramic Rolex's isn't a biggie if not tight fit which also is utter BS, I have yet to see a gen that has a little play in the SEL without the fact it's been treated by some idiot who probably bent the springbar so it becomes loose and wiggly.
Maybe maybe maybe someone (1 out of 1 million) has a bad SEL in his gen but then it's still one in a million..
:facepalm:
What makes you say that an ICHS is an unspottable flaw for anyone?
How can you generalize that? I dare anyone, shoot me pics of GMT's, Explorers, whatever model it is, I spot every CHS and ICHS.. Give me a good glimpse of an eye for 2 seconds on your wrist when sitting next to me I can also spot your ICHS. Please stop with that utter bullshit.
Same goes for people saying SEL fit on ceramic Rolex's isn't a biggie if not tight fit which also is utter BS, I have yet to see a gen that has a little play in the SEL without the fact it's been treated by some idiot who probably bent the springbar so it becomes loose and wiggly.
Maybe maybe maybe someone (1 out of 1 million) has a bad SEL in his gen but then it's still one in a million..
:facepalm:
well aren't you the cool one here, good for you if you can tell, my question wasn't to ask "Hey Quedick can you tell any flaws of this watch or that watch?!" No it really f****** wasn't. You are the kind that piss others off, not pure ignorance or bliss. Get out of my thread
Thank you very much! Some aren't really forum savy or Internet savy. I appreciate the time you took to write this and the education you gave me. +1 for you sir.Specific reason = reliability; correct handstack is an adapted modification, it will start to slip and stop working;
It is the least bothering and the least important flaw of them all because on the wrist You can´t see it (unless twice a day for some minutes).
When the lume is 1mm bad applied or a marker is 1mm off You can see it with the naked eye - and that bothers.
Now it´s there
Now it´s gone
- 3/6/14
- 14,674
- 6,128
- 113
- 25/8/13
- 15,406
- 4,258
- 113
A guy with 17 posts tells Q to get out of his thread?! Hahahahahaha
icard2:icard2:
The best part is a it's a Rolex question! Nice job [MENTION=116921]TitleistRolex[/MENTION]
icard2:icard2:The best part is a it's a Rolex question! Nice job [MENTION=116921]TitleistRolex[/MENTION]
- 3/6/14
- 14,674
- 6,128
- 113
A guy with 17 posts tells Q to get out of his thread?! Hahahahahaha
The best part is a it's a Rolex question! Nice job @TitleistRolex
Call me QueDick please! :rofl:
- 3/6/14
- 14,674
- 6,128
- 113
Still waiting for the rep version to arrive so I can do a comparison. I find it difficult to spot the HS without really focusing.
I honestly shouldn't have to watch my words if you were actually being a dick imo... However so by being a supporter it's ok to be malicious towards someone, and it being "okay" by saying don't take offense to it? Lmfao now that is comical
You responded with personal attacks which aren't tolerated.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Says gen in your sig lol. Honestly, even though I know very little, it looked like a CHS to me immediately, as that is what we are focusing on here