- 23/12/11
- 18,009
- 10,502
- 113
Better ask Judge Cavemax.
Better ask Judge Cavemax.
Did you have a birthday?No it does not, as @Tucker stated on page 2, that is too easy: Worst fakes
And he wants to see watches being owned. Oh and Tucker, you're again getting something wrong about me... I am not a judge, just a solicitor. And your signature is still wrong, ncncncn :no:
1. Where's yours?
2. Don't tell folks what to post - it stifles the board and limits exchange of thought.
We are kind of alike. I tested my daughter's Hundai Accent last week after I bought her new tires, and yes, I am a peeper. You obviously have a drivers license but are you old enough to buy beer where you live?I thought you noted my birthday after you were done peeping on my profile? But no, I didn't have birthday. However, as I mentioned a few posts earlier, I am not a race car driver, just a normal test driver, sadly So get that right please - it puts a wrong light on me :kiss:
Sorry dear Mr. Tucker, almighty god of RWI, that I posted one offer I stumbled upon over at alibaba, which even turned out as a "homage" :spit:. How could I be such a noob to post a picture from the world wide web without even thinking about your preferences of RWI-member owned watches. And just to refresh your knowledge about me: I live in Switzerland, where the legal drinking age is 16. So yes, in contrary to Americans my age, I am old enough to buy beer - but don't even think that we might chink glasses one day. :whistling:
See, this is no fun. They are all over the internet. We need to see those wrist turds owned by RWI members.
Apology accepted and proper respect noted. Carry on Grasshopper.Sorry dear Mr. Tucker, almighty god of RWI, that I posted one offer I stumbled upon over at alibaba, which even turned out as a "homage" :spit:. How could I be such a noob to post a picture from the world wide web without even thinking about your preferences of RWI-member owned watches. :whistling:
@pompompurin
Hmm interesting point, I'll try to find something in the Swiss jurisdiction. But as I said, I contacted the Swiss institute for intellectual property (IGE) and some lawyers that are known to be working for Rolex. Can't wait for their answer.
Oh and before anyone has any false thoughts or thinks he has to shout "Don't discuss replicas publicly": I did not mention Longbo, I did not mention RWI, nor did I mention the reason why I want these information. It was just a normal request which is pretty normal between lawyers and solicitors.
Well to me a facepalm - just like the "proverbial box of rocks" I received - are suited if a post is complete bullshit, written in poor language or whatever. But looks like you love giving these to new users / Noobs, as Tucker might call me, so go ahead.
However, this is still a forum and a community. Why should I hijack a thread and how should I do this? You aren't being cumbered to post or view these watches in any way. Aren't we allowed to discuss some aspects in a thread? It does not harm you "rep-a-holics" in any way and if you are not interested in the discussion, you could just skip the text and enjoy the "crap-tac-ular" watches? Vice versa, it does not mean that we, whom are engaged in this discussion, don't want to see these "crap-tac-ular" reps, as you call them. But hey, if you believe that I am hijacking this thread, go ahead; there is even a "report"-button under my posts, maybe you want to try that out.
Sorry dear Mr. Tucker, almighty god of RWI, that I posted one offer I stumbled upon over at alibaba, which even turned out as a "homage" :spit:. How could I be such a noob to post a picture from the world wide web without even thinking about your preferences of RWI-member owned watches. And just to refresh your knowledge about me: I live in Switzerland, where the legal drinking age is 16. So yes, in contrary to Americans my age, I am old enough to buy beer - but don't even think that we might chink glasses one day. :whistling:
Look at this P.O.S.