Nice Mods. Here’s mine.
What happened with the 4 and 10 o'clock marker?
Like what? I didn’t notice anything even under a loupe
DIAL: The overall quality of the black CF dial is pretty good, but the fat subdials are a joke. And since none of the other factories produce a good black dial (We looked at Buff, Noob and ARF v1) there was just no compromise for me on this very essential part… We had to go gen! And boy was that a good decision, that dial just makes the watch.
Do you have before and after pics of just the case? Curious as to what needs reshaped on these as I have not been keeping up with the new Daytonas
Very few Members of this Forum are fortunate enough to be able compare so many Genuine and Replica parts in person.
Even fewer are willing to take all of the time to carefully and honestly document so many of the differences, large and small. This is a very valuable review and I am grateful for all of the detail that has been so thoroughly addressed.
The Black 116500 Dial has always been a disappointment from all of the Replica Factories. ARF, Noob, and now Clean. Noob got the Sub-dial thickness correct near the end, but none of them have been able to get the correct matte silver finish. In this comparison, it appears that the Clean Black Dial silver Sub-dials are also just too shinny compared to a Gen.
awesome... I'm scared to know how much cost the gen dial.. ant total of this masterpiece...
congratulations
Sorry for my ignorance, are the black dials of the gen 116500 and 116520 the same?
I’m afraid they are far from being the same! This Gen Black 116500LN dial is very hard to find where as the 116520 dial is quite easy - a little harder with Blue Chromalight lume than Green Superluminova, the fonts & subdials are also very different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry for my ignorance, are the black dials of the gen 116500 and 116520 the same?