I’ve seen you say this a few times, but I don’t think I’ve seen you explain why.
I just ordered the JF and I’m starting to second guess myself a little, although the pics of the JF V10 and the recent talk of the fragility of the ZF inner bezel mechanism makes me less worried I made the wrong choice.
Well ok if you want to know why I say so, in short (details you have to really see them yourself to understand)
- better dial texture and finish
- far better datewheel
- better cyclop (curved surface as per gen)
- better hand geometry and lume (not perfect, but real-world accurate)
- case geometry is more accurate vs the JF one
There is NO wrong choice here. Both are reps. Some prefer A and some prefer B. I was stating my preference and some objective observations. With regard to the dive bezel mechanism, I will advise you to refrain from engaging it, not matter what factory it comes from. NONE of them are robust or will stand to constant use trust me. I have fixed this same issue from JF, XF and Noob so far, but only because the ZF diver is too new in the market now and I have not received any for repairs. Just take the dive bezel mechanism to be another A7750 sec@12 movement chronograph. Lay off it unless you really dive. But then, I would trust a Seiko or Casio dive watch a lot more.
There is nothing wrong getting either the JF or ZF diver. I will not tell you that you made the worse or better choice. Just enjoy the watch, neither of them is gen and both are decent replicas on the wrist in real life.