Really great summary, I will stay away from the ROOs and be thankful that my gen hasn't been repped lol
I think I know what you mean by the bezel numbers, they seem to be a bit different even with the ghost lines
Since you said and for the diver bezel numbers (but mentioned hands in the other section) does this mean you think the hands are more or less like gen?
Thanks for your input
Firstly I disagree with the term “ghost lines”. The lines are clear and distinct and nothing ghostly at all. They are simply the base upon which the lume is built. The lines which are seen are just the borders of the base not covered by the lume. Calling them “ghost lines” is meaningless but I guess as long as yoi understand the nomenclature used it’s fine.
I’ve replied on the hands a few times and I hope you stop asking after this: the lume on the hands is wrong and the geometry of the hands is incorrect VS the gen. There is NOTHING gen like about the hands. It’s good if you cannot see it. You won’t be presenting the watch to me in real life so as long as you like it, wear it happily.
The watch is a good rep in real life, that is my reply. The accuracy of the details I’ll leave it to each wearer to decide on his own. I don’t use the term “gen like” and definitely not “flawless” when it comes to reps. Gen is gen and rep is rep and I draw the line distinctly between the two. There are good reps and bad ones and everything in between. Anything else is subject to individual interpretation and I won’t debate with those.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk