So my first thoughts of this rep are that it feels and looks like a real quality watch.
The tells are there but only on zoomed in photographs or if you advertise your watch out there on gen forums where the members have knowledge of reps. They are as follows;
1. The blatant extra arm on the balance part of the movement.
2. The reflective properties of the bezel numbers when photographed (probably due to them not being liquidmetal inserted into the ceramic bezel as per the gen, but instead part of the coloured ceramic)
3. The ever so slightly thinner inner polished bezel ring, as a result this leaves the tops of the bezel numbers to be a bit too far away from the edge of the bezel when compared with gen (bigger gap between number and outer edge of the insert)
I think for any of these tells you would need a gen watch or a considerable zoom in on a clear photo. So if you want a nwbig Omega this could be the one for you as really when you consider the tells above - are they really even a thing for you? Not me, especially for £7500 less than the current market value of a used gen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk