• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Review of Upcoming RXF New Submariner 116610 LN and Comparison

1

1675Fanboy

Active Member
3/9/15
390
113
43
Kalev007 said:
I think the cyclops is acceptable.

On wrist even if it's straight it looks crooked on every angle you look at it IRL so you won't really notice that.
Click to expand...

Yep, it's always a tricky one to be sure of in photos. The only issue I see is the mark on the SEL but apart from that it all looks acceptable for $400.
 
drferrari1

drferrari1

Known Member
13/8/20
184
68
28
CONUS
Can Somebody make a comment regards the quality of the bracelet and clasp of the New sub 904l rxf?


Sent from my iPhone using RWI
 
  • Like
Reactions: Enrage
Repmaster1337

Repmaster1337

TC, WM9 interested❤️
Supporter
Certified
9/9/19
2,190
1,656
113
Recieved the 'gen baby' today:)

It come in good packaging- correct serial number, price tag and just look very premium.

The best crystal seen on a rep and the cyclops is craazy good. Good bh effect, crisp and clear. Dw dead on center.

Insert is really nice and is the same as zzf v2s if not better. Medium to turn it while zzf is very stiff arf is to light. Movement is smooth and no headache is given.

Bracelet is like zzf, bad clasp and screws. But smoother edged around each link. Recess is good.
gjOo2.jpg
gjYPE.jpg
gjy0n.jpg
gjqgt.jpg
gj953.jpg
gjrKD.jpg
gjnts.jpg
gj6NY.jpg
gjBMo.jpg
gjt1k.jpg
gjQgJ.jpg
gjCTW.jpg
gjpoP.jpg
gjP0S.jpg
gjX5Q.jpg
gjdBL.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pompompurin, d3s19n, GingerBubba and 1 other person
D

dla329

Getting To Know The Place
27/10/19
82
57
18
Kalev007 said:
RFX insert flaking - I don't nobody doesn't thats why I said ZZF is proven. RFX could be crap could be even better no one knows that yet.

I meant watch is proven workhorse not the 3135. I've had two ZZFs both with ETAs and now the 3130 is incoming (V2S no-date).

The CF V3 insert should be better in low light some who compared it to gen said its not worth going gen with that one. I can compare CF V2 and V3 insert/bezel once I receive my V2S. But they are all dull in low light ARF and so on they all are.

The cyclops is fine on ZZF and you're gonna go gen anyway with the crystal so the RFX crystal doesn't really matter its maybe better but not gen.

RXF has bad rehaut engraving and that's something you're stuck with.

ZZF is still the only one you have to look twice to see is that rep or not.

This was posted on another thread yesterday gen and ZZF (all stock) :

81286038f81f3688768aefcfc0f27ebd.jpg
Click to expand...

Yes, but you count it as a pro, that the zzf insert doesn t flake.

the gen Comparison pic is not really in low light, but on the LV it looks better.
It depents on what lighting u look the watch and then u don t have to look twice witch is the gen:)

here another thread pic zzf and gen
 
d3s19n

d3s19n

Renowned Member
12/6/18
646
518
93
diamant said:
Recieved the 'gen baby' today:)

It come in good packaging- correct serial number, price tag and just look very premium.

The best crystal seen on a rep and the cyclops is craazy good. Good bh effect, crisp and clear. Dw dead on center.

Insert is really nice and is the same as zzf v2s if not better. Medium to turn it while zzf is very stiff arf is to light. Movement is smooth and no headache is given.

Bracelet is like zzf, bad clasp and screws. But smoother edged around each link. Recess is good.
gjOo2.jpg
gjYPE.jpg
gjy0n.jpg
gjqgt.jpg
gj953.jpg
gjrKD.jpg
gjnts.jpg
gj6NY.jpg
gjBMo.jpg
gjt1k.jpg
gjQgJ.jpg
gjCTW.jpg
gjpoP.jpg
gjP0S.jpg
gjX5Q.jpg
gjdBL.jpg
Click to expand...

thanks for the pics but honestly no offense they look like (good) abstract art...

I don’t know photography but can we please get some regular aspect ratio, angles, and lighting lol.

Smoother edges on the bracelet? Gotta see it! Disappointed about the clasp tho
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pizzo
Rol.exe

Rol.exe

Getting To Know The Place
17/8/20
77
85
18
New Zealand
Finally, I may have something new to contribute!

One of the clearest tells for an RXF comes from the serial numbers. So far, I have seen:

3x F77S7878
3x D55P5858
2x E66R6868
1x A11L1818

Letters occupy the first and fourth places. So far they have been 11 to 13 letters apart in the alphabet.

With the numbers, only one is variable and this occupies the second, third, fifth, and seventh places. So far, it looks like the variable number equates to the first letter + 1 ie. F is the 6th letter of the alphabet so the variable number is 6+1=7. The exception so far is the A which retains the variable number as 1.

The sixth and eight places are always an 8.

The numbers appear random enough at first glance but this pattern should help us spot RFX reps in comparison shots in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pompompurin, Maupinator, Member X and 1 other person
2841

2841

Daytona Hoarder
Certified
6/6/19
2,025
1,931
113
USA
Rol.exe said:
Finally, I may have something new to contribute!

One of the clearest tells for an RXF comes from the serial numbers. So far, I have seen:

3x F77S7878
3x D55P5858
2x E66R6868
1x A11L1818

Letters occupy the first and fourth places. So far they have been 11 to 13 letters apart in the alphabet.

With the numbers, only one is variable and this occupies the second, third, fifth, and seventh places. So far, it looks like the variable number equates to the first letter + 1 ie. F is the 6th letter of the alphabet so the variable number is 6+1=7. The exception so far is the A which retains the variable number as 1.

The sixth and eight places are always an 8.

The numbers appear random enough at first glance but this pattern should help us spot RFX reps in comparison shots in the future.
Click to expand...

You must be fun at parties.... :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blaze00215, Member X, stufuse and 7 others
Hinclimincli

Hinclimincli

I'm Pretty Popular
Certified
18/12/09
2,605
1,876
113
Try with the sun in front of the watch, not behind. It also helps if you take the pic from a little further, taking photos so close tends to distort the object a little bit as it gives it some sort of fisheye effect. Nevertheless, thanks a lot for the good effort mate, the watch looks gorgeous.
 
YellowFin

YellowFin

Not pretty, hardly popular
28/1/20
2,527
2,807
113
Molvania
Rol.exe said:
Finally, I may have something new to contribute!

One of the clearest tells for an RXF comes from the serial numbers. So far, I have seen:

3x F77S7878
3x D55P5858
2x E66R6868
1x A11L1818

Letters occupy the first and fourth places. So far they have been 11 to 13 letters apart in the alphabet.

With the numbers, only one is variable and this occupies the second, third, fifth, and seventh places. So far, it looks like the variable number equates to the first letter + 1 ie. F is the 6th letter of the alphabet so the variable number is 6+1=7. The exception so far is the A which retains the variable number as 1.

The sixth and eight places are always an 8.

The numbers appear random enough at first glance but this pattern should help us spot RFX reps in comparison shots in the future.
Click to expand...

Pedantics Anonymous? ;)
 
Hinclimincli

Hinclimincli

I'm Pretty Popular
Certified
18/12/09
2,605
1,876
113
By the way, has anyone tried to put this insert on a ZZF? Is it actually better in terms of numerals colour and thinness of the insert?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom