On RAF there is a gap between insert and bezel; especially visible around the 12 hrs. position. Not sure if the insert is an gen like press fit like on my ARF.
Yep it looks that way. Need to see in person tho could be bad lighting. But yes if it's a gap it's pretty bad. I hope the insert is press fit like the gen so it can be swapped, but if there is a gap, i doubt.On RAF there is a gap between insert and bezel; especially visible around the 12 hrs. position. Not sure if the insert is an gen like press fit like on my ARF.
It might be, the white triangle at 12 looks like it's reflecting. I hope so too I ordered one. I really love the 16610LV and I wanted a good one. TC is impossible to get, hence I think this is the next best choice.Im seeing the gap now too. Im hoping its just bad lighting.....
Yes the pip looks nice and somehow it looks like they almost perfectly copied the numerals of the LN bezel I have and used those on the LV bezelOn the positive side of things the Pip and pearl look better
It might be, the white triangle at 12 looks like it's reflecting. I hope so too I ordered one. I really love the 16610LV and I wanted a good one. TC is impossible to get, hence I think this is the next best choice.
It looks like it's casting a shadow and it's not a gap. Look at it between 15 and 20. No shadow and the green go straight to the edege.
Those marks around 20 looks like dirt on the edge of the bezel to me. but it's hard to tell. I doubt it's damage tho knowing Steve.
I'd say it looks great I'd be super stoked about this LV myself personally. The bezel looks good that gap we're seeing is what I believe to be the measure of recess and/or the bezel insert fitted deeper into the bezel ring then usual, (my liking & preference) as it looks esthetically pleasing to my eyes.I'm watching Home Alone with my kids but I didn't want to keep you boys waiting. I'm stoked on it.
CGs look pretty good to me, maybe a tad stumpy but well within acceptability for me. Lugs are a tad fat, but leave room to work. Hands look nice, the picture is distorting them as they look normal in video.
SH movement?
I hope you are right I took the photo of the hen in the comparison above with my phone about 20cm away. The lugs looks longer in the gen that go beyond the end of the sel. And thinner.I wouldn’t worry about the lugs too much, a QC photo and some dealer pics will be taken from about 18” with a smartphone which will distort them - especially towards the end - because of the way they curve away from the lens. Official / properly shot watches will be shot with a larger lens from at least 3’ to avoid this distortion.
Yes, exactly %I wouldn’t worry about the lugs too much, a QC photo and some dealer pics will be taken from about 18” with a smartphone which will distort them - especially towards the end - because of the way they curve away from the lens. Official / properly shot watches will be shot with a larger lens from at least 3’ to avoid this distortion.