It had a RA sticker, it this good or bad?@Carrick1
were you able to figure out if yours has the arf or raf stickers?
boh who understands us is goodIt had a RA sticker, it this good or bad?
Why does he says 316L steel when every TD says 904L?Found this video on YouTube of the 16610LV RAF
Nice. May you do a few pics of it please ?Meanwhile, I received the bezel you guy suggested from eBay. It feels very good. Much much much closer to gen than ARF/RAF. And it was only 98 dollars or so!
Did not install it yet as my watch is at the watchsmith for other work but I am very excited
Can i have link for this bezel please?Meanwhile, I received the bezel you guy suggested from eBay. It feels very good. Much much much closer to gen than ARF/RAF. And it was only 98 dollars or so!
Did not install it yet as my watch is at the watchsmith for other work but I am very excited
Meanwhile, I received the bezel you guy suggested from eBay. It feels very good. Much much much closer to gen than ARF/RAF. And it was only 98 dollars or so!
Did not install it yet as my watch is at the watchsmith for other work but I am very excited
The older JF models (before ARF ... before RAF) had very good bezels... but changed them within the "evolution" of the JF versions
Really ?I can concur that the late JF bezel was terrible. Bezel action was terrible and the one i got wasn't even gen spec (i couldn't fit gen insert)
Yes. I replaced it by a TC and insert fits perfectlyReally ?
I have had two JF 16610 and both were great pieces (one I still have and is a SuperFranken - bought this a base watch)
No issues with insert or such thing. I still use there the JF bezel assemby with GEN Tritium insert.
I only heard the latest batch of JF (before it became ARF) were much bader ... But I never had one of these.
Yes. I replaced it by a TC and insert fits perfectlyReally ?
I have had two JF 16610 and both were great pieces (one I still have and is a SuperFranken - bought this a base watch)
No issues with insert or such thing. I still use there the JF bezel assemby with GEN Tritium insert.
I only heard the latest batch of JF (before it became ARF) were much bader ... But I never had one of these.
also for me the second one proposed, by the way always arf, still had the problem of the case crown gap, but I accepted it anyway I will have it fixed by my watchmaker, otherwise with the cny it would take too longAlso interested in a link for the bezel.
First watch my TD found a flaw and returned, second watch has the gap between case and crown. Now going back for the 3rd round some time after CNY...
This is the link to it. It’s the WSO.Do you have a WSO bezel assembly or the one from StarTime ?
The older JF models (before ARF ... before RAF) had very good bezels... but changed them within the "evolution" of the JF versions
QC rejects are sent back to the factory so they can get a different one. Factories sell watches first; parts for watches are only sold when extras are available.I ordered a raf bracelet in November from a TD and still haven't gotten it. When I follow up, they said getting parts takes longer than getting a watch. I'm wondering why can't they send me a bracelet from one of the QC rejects?